The Supreme Court criticised CFSL for giving “wishy-washy answers” in testing leaked audio tapes linked to ex-Manipur CM N Biren Singh’s alleged role in ethnic violence. The bench clarified it only wanted a voice-match, not video authenticity.
The Supreme Court rebuked IPS officer Ashok Mishra for filing a contradictory affidavit that appeared to favor murder convicts. The bench accepted his apology but warned him to uphold “loyalty to the Constitution over subservience to superiors.”
The Supreme Court warned that unchecked ecological damage in Himachal Pradesh could wipe the State off the map. It initiated a suo motu PIL and demanded urgent action from the State and Centre.
The Supreme Court questioned the Maharashtra government’s rush to list its appeal against the acquittal of all accused in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. The Court reminded that stays on acquittals are granted only in the “rarest of rare” cases.
The Supreme Court of India urged a divorcing couple to meet for dinner to resolve their issues amicably, emphasizing the importance of their three-year-old child’s welfare. The judges highlighted that personal communication could lead to positive outcomes, showcasing a compassionate approach to family disputes rather than a purely legalistic one.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India on Monday clearly stated that India cannot act as a “dharamshala” (public shelter) for refugees from around the world, while rejecting a plea by a Sri Lankan Tamil national who was facing deportation after completing a jail sentence. A Bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice K Vinod Chandran was hearing the case of Subaskaran, a Sri Lankan Tamil who had challenged an order of the Madras High Court directing him to leave India immediately after serving a seven-year sentence under various laws including the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA).
The Consortium of National Law Universities has pledged to release corrected results for CLAT UG 2025 within two hours, following Supreme Court scrutiny of previous answer key errors. Criticism was directed at the exam’s question quality, impacting numerous students’ eligibility and ranks. The court demanded prompt improvements to the examination process.
