The Supreme Court will hear a plea on Tuesday filed by an accused in the murder of tailor Kanhaiya Lal, who was killed by two Muslim men, challenging the release of the film ‘Udaipur Files’.
The Supreme Court encountered difficulties in understanding a judgment by retired Justice Sureshwar Thakur due to its complex language, notably regarding the unconstitutionality of Section 3G of the National Highways Act. The confusion led to a humorous exchange among justices, prompting a stay of the judgment to allow further review.
The Supreme Court of India declined to hear a plea for an audit of the IRCTC Tatkal booking system, advising the petitioner to approach the appropriate High Court. The petition highlighted issues like website failures and accessibility problems for travelers, indicating a need for a thorough examination of the system.
The Supreme Court of India has postponed the hearing on PILs seeking RTI coverage for major political parties, aimed at enhancing transparency and limiting black money in elections. The case will now be reconsidered on May 15. Advocates argue this could reshape political accountability in India’s electoral system.
Today, On 19th February, The Supreme Court strongly criticized a lawyer for seeking an adjournment due to a senior advocate’s absence. The bench made it clear that merely naming a senior counsel would not be a valid reason for delaying proceedings. Emphasizing the need to curb this practice, the court asserted that such tendencies among lawyers must stop. The remark highlights the judiciary’s firm stance on ensuring the smooth and timely functioning of cases.
The Supreme Court of India has struck down the electoral bonds scheme, emphasizing the voters’ entitlement to information about electoral candidates. The scheme was found to disproportionately impact this right and failed to be the least restrictive measure in curbing black money. The Court’s decision marks a significant step towards enhancing transparency and equity in political funding.
The Supreme Court declared the Electoral Bonds scheme unconstitutional, annulling the amendments to the Income Tax and Representation of People Act. The scheme’s anonymity violated rights to information and expression. The State Bank of India was instructed to stop issuing electoral bonds, and transparency on donations and recipients was mandated. The decision addressed the unequal impact of corporate and individual contributions.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, has declared the Electoral Bonds scheme unconstitutional, invalidating anonymous political party donations. The Court cited violations of the right to information and free speech, mandating disclosure of bond recipients and refunding unused bonds. The scheme, introduced in 2018, aimed for transparency but faced criticism for fostering corruption and favoritism.