Justice Surya Kant takes oath as India’s 53rd CJI on Nov 24, set to oversee major cases on elections, cyber law, sedition, and refugee rights. His long tenure promises landmark judgments on key legal and social issues.
CJI B.R. Gavai retires after delivering 464 judgements and serving on 772 benches during a standout 6.5-year tenure. His authorship rate never fell below 50%, marking him as one of the Supreme Court’s most consistent judges.
SCBA President Vikas Singh hailed Justice BR Gavai for restoring the dignity of lawyers and strengthening the bond between bar and bench. He credited the outgoing CJI for ensuring fair treatment, accessibility, and respect for the legal community.
To avoid delays in accommodation for incoming Chief Justices, the Supreme Court has decided to keep two Lutyens’ Delhi bungalows permanently ready as official CJI residences. This move ensures smooth transition and better administrative planning at the top judicial level.
On Karwa Chauth 2025, the Supreme Court has permitted its female employees to attend office in traditional attire instead of the prescribed uniform. The circular emphasizes cultural inclusivity and respect for festival observances within the workplace.
Today, On 1st August, Udaipur Files row reached Delhi High Court, which questioned the Centre’s authority under the Cinematograph Act. “What made you suggest cuts?” the Chief Justice asked, slamming post-certification interference despite CBFC’s expert scrutiny and legal process.
Supreme Court to hear a petition on July 28, 2025, seeking FIR against Justice Varma over cash seizure. Advocate Nedumpara says CJI agreed after he “mentioned” the Article 32 plea.
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL seeking mandatory six airbags in passenger vehicles, calling it a policy matter. The petitioner was told to approach the government instead.
Today, On 24th July, Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s approval of the film, alleging it promotes communal hatred and portrays Indian Muslims to terrorists.
Today, On 15th July, The Supreme Court refused to grant early release to a terror convict, stating, “If the act was committed to create fear, it carries the characteristics of a terrorist act,” and advised him to challenge the remission policy instead.
