Rahul Gandhi has criticized the RSS for questioning the terms “secular” and “socialist” in the Constitution’s Preamble, accusing them of favoring the Manusmriti agenda. He claims the RSS aims to undermine the rights of marginalized groups and has warned them against their intentions. The controversy follows an RSS demand for debate on these terms.
The Supreme Court of India declined to hear a petition for the early release of the NEET-UG 2025 final answer key, stating such matters should first be addressed in High Courts. The Court emphasized practical concerns and the established process, allowing students to challenge results later, while avoiding potential mass litigation.
Karnataka Governor Gehlot has referred the Muslim reservation bill to President Droupadi Murmu, citing constitutional concerns and a Supreme Court judgment. The bill proposed 4% reservation for Muslims in government contracts. Gehlot emphasized religion-based reservations contradict the Constitution and could undermine its principles, particularly with ongoing Supreme Court scrutiny.
The Delhi Government informed the High Court that officials of the State and District Consumer Commissions will remain in their positions until new appointments are made, following a Public Interest Litigation by Sardar RP Singh. The Bench emphasized the need for operational commissions and adherence to Supreme Court guidelines to prevent vacancies.
The Supreme Court criticized the Uttar Pradesh government for interfering in a private dispute over the management of the Shri Banke Bihari temple in Vrindavan. The Court warned such interference undermines the rule of law, emphasizing the government should not involve itself in private legal matters. The Court firmly rejected the government’s attempts to hijack the case.
The Supreme Court of India has referred Karnataka’s challenge against a Rs 3,011.66 crore TDR order to the Chief Justice, questioning the compensation for 15 acres while appeals for 472 acres remain. Legal arguments highlight potential misuse of authority and the application of laws from differing years, influencing future land acquisition compensation.
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL regarding a protocol lapse during CJI Gavai’s visit to Maharashtra, labeling it a publicity stunt. The petitioner was fined ₹7,000 for misusing judicial time, with the Court emphasizing the importance of respecting constitutional offices and discouraging trivial issues from being used for media attention.
The Supreme Court of India criticized Madhya Pradesh minister Vijay Shah for his remarks against Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, deeming them shameful. A three-member Special Investigation Team will investigate the FIR against him. The Court emphasized the importance of respect for the armed forces and questioned the sincerity of Shah’s apology.