The All India Muslim Personal Law Board plans to file a contempt plea in the Supreme Court against the government’s launch of the Waqf Umeed Portal, deeming it illegal as the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 is under judicial review. They argue it disrespects court authority and disrupts religious property management.
During a Supreme Court hearing on the Gateway of India jetty project, a debate arose about the meanings of ‘Aamchi Mumbai’ and ‘Tyanchi Mumbai.’ The Chief Justice explained the difference, highlighting local identity and belonging in Mumbai.
The Supreme Court examined the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, comparing Waqf to Hinduism’s Moksha and addressing its religious significance. Kapil Sibal argued that Waqf is a divine dedication, unlike mere charity, countering the Centre’s claims. The case highlights the essence of charity across religions and its implications for religious endowments.
The Supreme Court of India has heard the bail plea of Suman Shaik, a Bangladeshi national accused of human trafficking through the India-Bangladesh border. Justices Surya Kant and N.K. Singh presided over the case, focusing on the illegal movement of foreign nationals. The court’s decision on bail is pending.
Today, On 19th May, Operation Sindoor row reaches Supreme Court as Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad challenges his arrest, calling his Facebook remarks “entirely patriotic statements.” SC agrees to urgently hear his plea against the Haryana Police action.
The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, passed by the Indian Parliament, alters the 1995 Waqf Act, prompting widespread debate and legal challenges. Notable changes include expanded government control and inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards, raising concerns about religious autonomy. The Supreme Court is currently reviewing its constitutional validity amidst ongoing hearings.
The Supreme Court of India will hear petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, on May 5. Critics question its constitutional validity, especially amid disputes over data and provisions. The Central Government supports the law’s implementation, arguing against delays, while various political and civil groups oppose it and seek legal intervention.
Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara petitioned the Supreme Court to reform the current collegium system and senior advocate designations, alleging favoritism and elitism. Despite being cautioned by the Chief Justice, he argued that the system unfairly benefits a small elite, violating constitutional rights. The petitioners demand an overhaul for enhanced judicial fairness and equality.
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey criticised the Supreme Court, saying there’s no need for Parliament if judges are making laws. He controversially blamed CJI Sanjiv Khanna for all civil wars in the country, drawing sharp criticism from Congress.
The Supreme Court of India will hear ten petitions, including one by MP Asaduddin Owaisi, challenging the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2025 on April 16. This Act introduces significant changes to the management of waqf properties, increasing Central Government authority and altering the criteria for declaring waqf, raising concerns among communities.
