The Delhi High Court has asked the Delhi Police and the Delhi government to respond to a petition raising concerns that CCTV cameras are still not installed in all police stations, even though the Supreme Court had earlier issued clear directions mandating such installation.
Today, On 27th January, The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking the cancellation of AAP’s registration due to alleged non-disclosure of criminal records by party members. The court found no substantial grounds to support the claims made in the plea. It emphasized the need for concrete evidence in such matters. This ruling highlights the principle of due process in addressing allegations against political entities.
![[UPSC Aspirant’s Death Tragedy] "Uniform Standards Needed to Ensure Student Safety at Coaching Centers": Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IMG.jpg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 21st October, the Supreme Court of India called for uniform safety standards in coaching centers following the drowning deaths of three civil service aspirants in Delhi. The court demanded stricter regulations to enhance student protection and prevent future tragedies, emphasizing permanent oversight and comprehensive policies across the National Capital Region.
Today(on 17th May), The Calcutta High Court has granted bail to BJP worker Piyali Das from Sandeshkhali, who surrendered in a criminal case. Das, accused of coercing a woman into signing a blank paper used for filing sexual assault complaints against TMC leaders, finds relief in the court’s decision.
![[Manual Scavenging Death] HC Directed Gov. To Pay Rs 30 Lakh To Deceased Wife](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-39-2.png?resize=305%2C165&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court issued a notice on 10th May, to the deceased sanitation worker’s wife in response to the Delhi Government’s appeal challenging the order for enhanced compensation. The court instructed the government to pay Rs 30 lakh within six weeks, as sought by the woman in accordance with Supreme Court directives on manual scavenging victim compensation. The case is scheduled for the next hearing in October.
