Allahabad High Court’s Justice Sameer Jain has recused himself from hearing Samajwadi Party leader Mohammad Azam Khan’s 2016 Yatim Khana eviction case. The earlier stay on the trial court’s final judgment will remain in effect until the next hearing.
![[Mathura Temple-Mosque Dispute] Hindu Litigants File Caveat in Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-20-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 6th August, Hindu litigants filed a caveat in the Supreme Court regarding the Mathura temple-mosque dispute to ensure their participation in any future hearings. This comes after the Allahabad High Court dismissed a plea challenging the maintainability of 18 cases related to the dispute. The legal battle holds potential implications for the interpretation of the Places of Worship Act in India.
In a legal battle over the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, Hindu representatives reported missing property documents, complicating the case. The Hindu side challenges the Waqf Board’s ownership claim and the alleged compromise. The Muslim side argues the suit is time-barred. The High Court scheduled the next hearing for May 20. The case continues to draw attention.
Today, On 15th May, The Shahi Idgah dispute took on a new dimension as Hindu parties accused the Sunni Waqf Board of fraudulent representation in a 1968 compromise. They contested the ownership of the disputed land and raised questions about the mosque committee’s authority. The case’s outcome could have far-reaching implications for religious site management and communal harmony.