The Karnataka High Court criticised Indian society for deep-rooted discrimination, calling it “one of the most racist societies in the world” during a hearing on Sudhir Chaudhary’s FIR case. The Court said societal mindset, not just politics or media, fuels communal division.
The Delhi High Court has protected journalist Sudhir Chaudhary’s personality rights, ordering the removal of AI-generated and deepfake content from social media. Uploaders have 48 hours to comply, failing which Google and Meta will act.
On 13th March, The Jharkhand High Court grants protective order to AajTak’s Sudhir Chaudhary, following SC/ST Act complaint. Similar to Supreme Court’s ruling, no coercive actions against him. Allegations stem from comments on tribal community after former Chief Minister’s detention. Supreme Court’s notice to state police prevents coercive steps. High Court aligns stance after apex court’s decree. Jharkhand High Court defers examination of annulment pleas until Supreme Court’s deliberations. Chaudhary’s legal representatives focus on complainants’ allegations only.
The NBDSA fined Aaj Tak news channel Rs 75,000 for biased reporting on a statement by Barack Obama regarding minority rights in India. The anchor was found to have connected Obama’s statement to separatist and extremist groups, violating principles of objectivity and neutrality. NBDSA ordered the removal of objectionable content and advised adherence to broadcasting standards.
Prominent TV news anchor Sudhir Chaudhary and the renowned Hindi news channel, Aaj Tak, are currently embroiled in a legal controversy. They have approached the Karnataka High Court with a plea to quash the First Information Report (FIR) filed against them. The FIR pertains to alleged offences under Sections 153A and 505 of the India […]
