The Madras High Court upheld its interim stay on Tamil Nadu legislation altering the Governor’s authority to appoint Vice-Chancellors, asserting potential unconstitutionality. It refuted claims of interfering with a Supreme Court decision, emphasizing judicial duty and the necessity of addressing unconstitutional laws without delay, reinforcing commitments to justice and constitutional integrity.
The Supreme Court of India accepted an apology from the CBI for violating a stay order in a case involving a man impersonating an IB officer. The court criticized the routine transfer of investigations to the CBI without solid evidence, restoring the case to local police and emphasizing the necessity of substantial proof for CBI involvement.
Today, On 10th January, The Supreme Court ruled against allowing puja at the well located within Sambhal’s Jama Masjid amid an ongoing temple-mosque dispute. The court emphasized maintaining the status quo while addressing the sensitive matter. It has also issued a notice to the Uttar Pradesh government, seeking its response on the issue. The case highlights the judicial approach to balancing religious sentiments and legal considerations.
The Delhi High Court has scheduled a hearing on December 19 for MP Raghav Chadha’s appeal against the cancellation of his official bungalow allotment. The court allowed amendments to his petition and questioned the urgency of the trial court’s vacated stay order on his eviction, which he aims to reinstate.
Today, On 9th September, The Supreme Court issued stay a High Court ruling directing the Uttar Pradesh government to prepare a new selection list for 69,000 assistant teachers. This offers temporary relief to current appointees amid ongoing legal disputes. The case highlights challenges in large-scale public sector recruitment drives, with the final outcome pending Supreme Court examination.
![[BREAKING] 'Unconstitutional' and 'Unsecular': CJI to Hold Final Hearing on Pleas Challenging Allahabad HC’s Order Scrapping UP Madarsa Education Act on August 13](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-30-1.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today has set a final hearing on August 13 for petitions challenging the annulment of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004. The Act was declared unconstitutional by the Allahabad High Court, but the Supreme Court highlighted the need for regulatory measures and stayed the high court’s judgment.
![[Haldwani Encroachment Case] 'Encroachers Are Also Humans': SC Directs Centre, Uttarakhand Govt. To Rehabilitate Families Living On Railway Land](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-3-5.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today directed the Central Government and Uttarakhand authorities to develop a rehabilitation policy for 4,365 families living near Haldwani Railway Station. The court emphasized the humane treatment of encroachers and criticized the Railways’ approach. It called for a balanced approach addressing long-term residents’ needs and specified measures for identifying land and relocating families.
The Gujarat High Court has temporarily banned the release of the movie ‘Maharaj’ by Yash Raj Films and Netflix, following a petition from the Vaishnavite Pustimargi sect. The petitioners objected to alleged scandalous and defamatory content, fearing incitement of hatred and violence. The court has issued notices to the filmmakers, setting the next hearing for June 18.
Today (3rd April): The Supreme Court issued a contempt notice to NCDRC members for defying a stay order and issuing Non-Bailable Warrants to a real estate firm. Despite their apology, the Court found their actions to be a mockery of the court and an act of absolute impunity. The seriousness of the situation was emphasized due to the potential impact on individuals’ life and liberty.
The Delhi High Court issued stay order barring private schools from increasing fees without government approval. This provides relief to private educational institutions and follows ongoing debates about fee regulations and autonomy in the education sector. The court’s decision is based on a plea by the Action Committee Unaided Recognised Schools and will be further reviewed on July 31.