Supreme Court Issues Notice on PIL Seeking Women’s Reservation in State Bar Councils

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a PIL seeking reservation for women advocates in State Bar Councils, aiming to address their under-representation in bar leadership and promote gender equality within India’s legal profession.

Supreme Court Notice to UP Bar Council Over Rs 14,000 Advocates’ Enrolment Fee, Terms It Prima Facie Breach of Past Judgment

The Supreme Court has issued notice to the UP Bar Council for demanding Rs 14,000 from new advocates under “certificate of practice,” calling it a clear conflict with its 2024 ruling in Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India. The Court said Bar Councils cannot charge beyond the statutory enrolment fee.

Supreme Court Seeks BCI Chairman’s Assistance on Enrolment Fee Cap: “We Are Not Inclined to Issue Notice, But Want BCI’s Response to Examine Compliance”

The Supreme Court asked BCI Chairman Manan Kumar Mishra to assist in checking compliance with the enrolment fee cap, saying, “We are not inclined to issue notice, but want BCI’s response to examine compliance with para 109.”

AIBE: Supreme Court Seeks BCI Response on PIL Challenging Rs.3,500 Exam Fee

Today, On 19th May, The Supreme Court has now asked the Bar Council of India to respond to a PIL challenging the Rs.3,500 fee for the AIBE. Earlier in February, the Court declined to hear the PIL but allowed a representation to BCI.

Chief Minister Launches Health Insurance Scheme For Lawyers: “Jharkhand Becomes First State to Secure Advocates’ Future”

Jharkhand CM launches the Chief Minister Advocate Health Insurance Scheme, ensuring social security for state lawyers. “Jharkhand becomes the first state to secure advocates’ future,” said the CM at the historic event.

Supreme Court Rejects Plea Against Rs.3,500 AIBE Exam Fee: “You Want the Bar Councils to Survive or Not?”

Today, On 24th February, The Supreme Court refused to hear a plea challenging the Rs.3,500 fee for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). The court noted that it has already set limits on enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India (BCI). Imposing more restrictions could financially strain these bodies. The ruling highlights the necessity of maintaining bar councils’ financial stability.

Fake Law Degrees | “Initiate Nationwide Verification Of Advocates”: BCI Orders

The Bar Council of India (BCI) initiated a nationwide verification process for advocates in response to increasing cases of fake law degrees. This step aims to uphold the integrity of the legal profession by identifying and eliminating fraudulent practitioners. The BCI emphasized the importance of ensuring that only qualified and genuine advocates practice law in India.

SC Issues Notice on PIL Asks “Proportional Representation” For Women, PwDs, Queer Individuals, and Marginalized Groups in Bar Councils

The Supreme Court has issued a notice on a PIL regarding inadequate representation of women, queer individuals, persons with disabilities, and marginalized communities in the Bar Council of India and State Bar Councils. The petitioner urged recognition and addressed disproportionate representation, emphasizing the need for proportional representation in these councils for a more equitable legal profession.

“Commercial Activities Must Comply With Advocates Act and BCI Rules”: SC Asks BCI’s Response on JustDial’s Challenge Against Madras Hc’s Lawyer Ad Ban

The Supreme Court today seeks Bar Council of India’s response to JustDial’s appeal against a Madras High Court ruling on lawyer advertisements. The Court emphasized compliance with Advocates Act and BCI regulations. JustDial argued for its role as a directory service. BCI had issued removal notice to comply with the High Court’s order. Supreme Court awaits BCI’s response.

[Breaking] Enrollment Fees for Lawyers Cannot Exceed Rs. 750: Supreme Court Mandates For All State Bar Council

The Supreme Court today has mandated that State Bar Councils and the Bar Council of India cannot charge lawyers more than Rs 600 for enrolment fees, in accordance with Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act. This decision aims to make the enrolment process accessible and affordable, consistent with the Act. The ruling allows charges for legal aid services, but not during enrolment.