Supreme Court Backs SBI: No Detailed Reasons Needed If Inquiry Report Accepted in Disciplinary Cases

The Supreme Court restored SBI’s punishment against a messenger found guilty of bribery, ruling that disciplinary authorities need not give detailed reasons if they agree with the inquiry officer’s findings. This strengthens SBI’s stand on strict anti-corruption measures.

Madras High Court Upholds SBI’s Decision to Deny Job Over Poor Credit History: “Person With No Financial Discipline Can’t Be Trusted With Public Money”

The Madras High Court upheld SBI’s decision to cancel the appointment of a Circle Based Officer after a CIBIL report showed major loan defaults. Justice N. Mala dismissed the candidate’s writ petition, backing the bank’s stance on financial integrity.

Electoral Bonds Case | BJP Receives Rs.2,244 Crore Contribution in 2023-24, Congress Gets Rs.289 Crore

In the 2023-24 financial year, the BJP received Rs.2,244 crore through electoral bonds, while Congress got Rs. 289 crore in donations of Rs.20,000 and above. This shows a big difference in the financial support received by the two major parties. The BJP’s contributions through electoral bonds were much higher than Congress’s. This data highlights the continuing importance of electoral bonds in political funding.

Apex Court Orders Jet Airways Liquidation, Sets Aside Transfer To Jalan Kalrock Consortium

The Supreme Court of India, led by CJI DY Chandrachud, ordered the liquidation of Jet Airways, overturning the NCLAT’s approval of its ownership transfer to the Jalan Kalrock Consortium. The Court revealed that the consortium failed to meet financial obligations, prompting immediate liquidation and forfeiture of bank guarantees to protect creditors’ interests.

Jet Airways Transfer to Winning Bidder|| CJI Reserves Judgment on Plea Challenging NCLAT

Today, On 16th October, the Supreme Court reserved its judgment on SBI’s appeal against the NCLAT’s approval for Jet Airways’ ownership transfer to the Jalan Kalrock Consortium. Jet Airways, in insolvency since 2019, plans to resume operations in 2024, following disputes over payment obligations and resolution delays.

Free Certified Copy of NCLT Order Issued by Registry is Sufficient for Filing IBC Appeal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India today (27th Sept) ruled that a free certified copy of an NCLT order suffices for filing an appeal to the NCLAT, overturning a prior NCLAT decision. The Court clarified there’s no distinction between free and paid certified copies, emphasizing that a three-day delay in appeal was within acceptable limits.

SBI Moves NCDRC to Transfer Home Loan Dispute Involving Madras HC Justice J Nisha Banu Outside Tamil Nadu

SBI has asked the NCDRC to transfer a home loan dispute involving Madras High Court Justice J Nisha Banu to a forum outside Tamil Nadu, citing concerns of potential bias. The case is currently with the Madurai District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

Former Madhya Pradesh HC Judge, Justice Rohit Arya Joins BJP, Three Months After Retirement

Yesterday, On 14th July, Former Madhya Pradesh High Court judge, Justice Rohit Arya, joined the BJP three months after retiring. Known for diverse legal expertise, notable rulings, and controversies, his decision to enter politics marks a significant career shift. His induction into the BJP officiated by Dr. Raghavendra Sharma and signifies a noteworthy move from the judiciary to politics.

BREAKING | CJI Agrees to Consider Listing PIL for Court-Monitored SIT Probe into Electoral Bond Scheme

Today, On 12th July, The Chief Justice of India agreed to consider listing a PIL seeking an SIT probe into the Electoral Bond Scheme, acknowledging concerns about transparency and legality. The plea calls for investigating funding sources of companies that donated to political parties and recovering funds from “quid pro quo” arrangements. The Supreme Court has assured priority for an early hearing.

SBI Declines to Disclose Legal Fees Paid to Senior Advocate Harish Salve in Electoral Bond Case

The State Bank of India (SBI) refused to disclose legal fees paid to Senior Advocate Harish Salve in the Electoral Bond Case, citing RTI Act sections 8(1)(e) and (j). The refusal led to concerns about transparency and accountability in financial transactions linked to significant legal matters. Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench instructed SBI to reveal all details related to Electoral Bonds, including purchasers’ names and purchase dates, due to concerns about transparency and accountability.