No public notice and no invitation of objections, but identity, age and consent will still be verified: the Allahabad High Court has dispensed with Special Marriage Act notice publication for an adult interfaith couple who feared harm from their families, directing the Marriage Officer to proceed and the police to protect them. Lucknow: Waiving the […]
Rs 1,03,382 a month, paid voluntarily, has weighed against a husband in the Karnataka High Court, which held that a man who supports his wife without any court order cannot later claim inability to pay, and dismissed his writ petition with costs of Rs 2 lakh. Bengaluru: Dismissing a husband’s challenge to an interim maintenance […]
The Gauhati High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal, reaffirming that a Civil Judge (Junior Division) cannot dissolve a Muslim marriage or authenticate talaq. Only the District Judge can decide matrimonial disputes where no Family Court exists.
The Delhi High Court has ordered re-training for a Family Court judge who invented a provision to grant a divorce decree. It said, “The manner in which the judge conducted proceedings disturbs judicial conscience and threatens the integrity of justice.”
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a couple from different religions can live together despite ongoing criminal proceedings. The bench granted bail to Arif Siddiqui, who married a Hindu woman, emphasizing personal liberty and the couple’s right to make independent choices. The court rejected state interference in their relationship.
The Allahabad High Court held that Muslim men can’t be punished for bigamy under Mohammedan law. It observed that although the Quran allows polygamy for just reasons, men often misuse it for selfish purposes.
Uttarakhand: Observing that a person’s self-respect should not be sacrificed in the name of privacy, especially when the person is a child born in a live-in relationship, the Uttarakhand High Court on Wednesday questioned what was wrong with regulating such relationships.
The landmark case Supriyo Chakraborty & Anr. v. Union of India reshaped discussions on constitutional rights and marriage in India. While it denied a fundamental right to marry, the judgment acknowledged systemic discrimination against the LGBTIQ+ community. Also, the Supreme Court of India recently , on 9th of January,2025 rejected review petitions that challenged its previous ruling, which did not legally recognize queer marriages under Indian law.
The Gujarat High Court issued a notice to a woman who obtained a divorce on grounds of cruelty after learning her husband’s sister married outside their caste. The husband has challenged the family court’s decision, arguing it was unjust. The high court has scheduled a joint hearing for the matter on January 20, aiming to address the dispute comprehensively.
Today, On 13th December, Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna dismissed a petition from parents seeking to annul their adult daughter’s marriage, emphasizing that individuals have the right to make personal decisions. The court underscored the legal autonomy of consenting adults and urged parents to respect their child’s choice, reinforcing progressive values in India.
