The Patna High Court received a petition demanding the cancellation of the NEET UG exam due to alleged paper leaks. The plea calls for a CBI investigation, citing concerns over exam integrity and student futures. The scandal involves arrests, bribery, and organized gangs. Calls for re-conducting the exam and ensuring fairness grow.
Today, On 16th May, Swati Maliwal accuses an unnamed individual of manipulating videos to protect themselves, raising concerns about political tactics and media integrity. She alleges assault by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s personal secretary and filed an FIR with detailed accounts of the incident. The accused individual’s attempts at self-protection through video manipulation are under scrutiny.
Today, 13th May, Umar Khalid’s bail plea, filed under UAPA in the Delhi riots case, is pending a decision from the Karkardooma Court. The court reserved the order after arguments from both sides. Khalid’s defense emphasizes lack of substantial evidence and bias in media trial. The Delhi Police, opposing the bail, cited his alleged attempts to influence bail hearings through social media.
![[Amit Shah's Doctored Video Case] High Court Denies Lunch Motion Moved By Delhi Police](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-25-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Telangana High Court rejected the Delhi police’s lunch motion on 9th May, in the Amit Shah morphed video case, allowing further investigation. The court instructed the police to follow due process and approach the lower court for necessary actions. The case involves allegations of doctoring a video clip of Amit Shah, leading to arrests and ongoing investigations by the Delhi and Hyderabad police.
Journalist Rajat Sharma filed a PIL in the Delhi High Court seeking action against deepfake videos. The court issued a notice to the Central Government for a response within four weeks. Sharma’s plea aims for the identification and blocking of platforms creating deepfakes, and the appointment of a nodal officer to handle complaints. He highlighted the dangers and legal gaps associated with deepfakes.
![[IAS vs IPS]| Supreme Court Urges Settlement Between IAS and IPS Officers](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-144.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 7th May, The Supreme Court urged IAS and IPS officers to resolve their disputes for a harmonious work environment, suggesting withdrawing allegations and pursuing a settlement to prevent career harm. The court directed the officers to refrain from engaging in public conflicts and media interactions. The case has been temporarily halted for potential resolution.
Yesterday, On 30th April, The Delhi High Court classified sextortion as a grave societal threat, emphasizing its impact on victims’ privacy and psychological well-being. Justice Amit Mahajan, addressing the complexities of sextortion, denied bail to three accused individuals, highlighting the organized nature of their crimes and the need for thorough investigation before granting bail as a routine matter.
Today, 24th April,Umar Khalid’s lawyer argued in court that the allegations against him do not amount to a terrorism offense, emphasizing the lack of evidence. The defense also highlighted media scrutiny and called for a fair legal process. Khalid’s bail request is under consideration, with the next hearing scheduled for May 7. The lawyer cited inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case and urged the court to assess the evidence critically.
The Allahabad High Court granted bail to Riyaz, accused of insulting Lord Ram on Facebook. The decision based on his clean record and an apology. This case sparked debate on religious sensitivities and legal freedoms, but the court emphasized India’s secular values. The accused must now abide by certain conditions while on bail.
Today, 12th April, Advocate Shashank Shekhar Jha sent a letter to the Attorney General citing concerns about AAP supporters’ attempts to undermine the judiciary’s credibility on social media. Jha seeks permission to file a contempt of court case against AAP for misquoting the Delhi High Court and making baseless allegations. He urges the AG to address this issue to protect the judiciary’s authority.