Karnataka High Court will hear X Corp’s plea on July 8 against the Indian government’s ‘Sahyog’ portal, used for issuing content takedown orders. The court allowed X Corp to amend its petition and add respondents.
Justice PB Suresh Kumar of the Kerala High Court, in his farewell speech, advocated for new legislation to regulate social media, emphasizing that unverified posts undermine public trust in the judiciary. He highlighted the importance of balancing free speech with the integrity of the judiciary while also recognizing the role of technology in enhancing justice efficiency.
The Delhi High Court has requested responses from the Lieutenant Governor and Central Government regarding a petition that challenges an order empowering police to issue takedown notices for online content. The case raises concerns about potential misuse and violations of free speech. The next hearing is scheduled for September 17.
Following India’s airstrikes in ‘Operation Sindoor’, social media, particularly X, was inundated with misinformation. In response, the Indian government ordered the blocking of over 8,000 accounts, including international news outlets. X criticized this censorship while complying with the orders for legal protection. Misinformation about the strikes, including fake visuals, was widespread, prompting government action against false narratives.
Gujarat: The Gujarat High Court has taken suo-motu (on its own) notice of a shocking incident in Dahod district, where a tribal woman was reportedly disrobed, paraded, and dragged by a motorcycle. The incident, which occurred on January 28, has sparked outrage, especially after videos of the incident were widely circulated on social media.
Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation seeking to ban WhatsApp for non-compliance with new IT Rules. The petition, which raised security concerns and questioned the app’s encryption, was rejected by the Court, allowing WhatsApp to continue its operations despite claims of potential risks and misinformation.
The rise of legal influencers on social media has raised concerns about the potential for misleading legal advice. Experts highlight the risks of individuals relying on unqualified sources, which can result in serious legal and financial consequences. Caution is advised, stressing the importance of consulting qualified professionals for accurate guidance.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI Chandrachud, Today halted the implementation of Fact Check Units (FCUs) under the 2023 IT Amendment Rules, emphasizing the need to examine its impact on free speech. This decision followed petitions challenging the rules, including one from comedian Kunal Kamra, who argued that FCUs could lead to biased censorship by social media platforms regarding the Central government.
On Tuesday (19th March): Comedian Kunal Kamra has approached the Supreme Court to halt the implementation of Fact Check Units (FCUs) under the 2023 amendments to the IT Amendment Rules. He argues that this may lead to censorship, limiting free speech and affecting public discourse. His plea underscores concerns about online content regulation, potential impacts on democracy, and his fundamental right to practice his profession.