Today, On 25th August, Supreme Court told comedian Samay Raina that the apology he tendered in court must also appear on the same platforms where he posts content, stressing that influencers should use their reach to spread awareness and respect persons with disabilities.
The Delhi High Court ruled that social media influencers can critique consumer brands, provided their opinions are backed by scientific evidence. The court dismissed San Nutrition’s bid to halt negative reviews about its whey protein products, emphasizing the importance of free speech and public access to information on health-related matters.
A case has been filed against popular YouTubers for alleged obscenity in the show India’s Got Latent. The FIR was registered after complaints that the content was inappropriate and violated Indian laws on public decency. Authorities are investigating whether the show broke rules under Section 292 of the IPC and the IT Act. This incident highlights the growing scrutiny of digital content and the legal responsibility of creators.
A Tamil YouTuber is facing legal action for organizing a gender reveal party, violating local regulations and the PC-PNDT Act. Irfan’s video, with 2 million views, led to the health department taking action and cybercrime authorities removing it from YouTube. This case may set a precedent for future legal and cultural implications.
The Supreme Court of India recently upheld the consumer’s right to health and quality product information in advertising. Justices directed advertisers to submit a self-declaration form confirming compliance with the Advertising Code before advertising. The court emphasized the importance of protecting consumers and urged the relevant ministries to establish a consumer complaint system.
![[Patanjali Fake Ad Case] Celebrities, Influencers Equally Liable for Misleading Ads: SC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/MicrosoftTeams-image-9.png?resize=447%2C361&ssl=1)
Today(7th May): The Supreme Court ruled that celebrities and influencers are equally responsible for endorsing misleading advertisements. They emphasized the need for transparency in paid endorsements and stated that endorsers, advertisers, and advertising agencies share equal responsibility. The Court issued directions to promote accountability, including the submission of self-declaration forms by advertisers and TV broadcasters.
