The Delhi High Court has postponed arguments on Medha Patkar’s appeal against her 2001 defamation conviction by LG VK Saxena, with hearings now scheduled for July 14 and 15. Patkar’s conviction and sentence were previously stayed, allowing her release after an interim bail. She challenges both the guilty verdict and compensation order.
The Centre informed today the Supreme Court that a ‘certificate of identity’ issued under the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 will be accepted as valid documentation for applying for a PAN card. This is in response to a petition urging the addition of a third gender category to PAN cards, enabling accurate match with Aadhaar records.
![[Defamation Case] Saket Court Suspends Medha Patkar’s Sentence For Remarks Against Delhi L-G VK Saxena](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-6-4.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 29th July, the Saket Court suspended activist Medha Patkar’s sentence for defaming Delhi L-G VK Saxena and granted her bail on a bond of Rs. 25,000. The court also issued a notice to the Delhi L-G, seeking his response by September 4. Patkar had been sentenced to five months in jail and ordered to pay damages but has now been granted bail.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking BCCI and Delhi Capitals to pay for IPL security expenses, citing the absence of an agreed fee for security services during matches. The petitioner pointed to previous cases in Mumbai and Jaipur, but the court deemed it a policy decision, concluding no outstanding dues. The decision allows Delhi Police to levy fees in the future.
![[Breaking] Activist Medha Patkar Gets 5 Months Jail in Defamation Case by LG VK Saxena](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-49.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 24th May, Medha Patkar convicted in a defamation case filed by VK Saxena for making defamatory statements. The ruling holds legal implications, as she faces up to two years in jail or a fine. This marks a significant development in their long-standing legal dispute. Additionally, Patkar faces charges of fraud in a separate case.
The Bombay High Court directed litigant Nixon D’Silva to present EVM manipulation prevention suggestions to the Election Commission, emphasizing the court’s limited jurisdiction. This reflects the court’s respect for the separation of powers and highlights the importance of involving the appropriate authorities in addressing concerns related to EVM manipulation effectively.
Uttarakhand High Court Calls for Blacklisting of Horse and Mule Operators Subjecting Animals to Cruelty The Uttarakhand High Court has issued a directive to the state government, urging the formulation of a policy to blacklist horse and mule operators found guilty of subjecting their animals to cruelty and maltreatment. This move comes in response to […]
