The Madras High Court, hearing the Jana Nayagan censor dispute, said filmmakers cannot seek relief citing a Rs 500 crore investment. The court observed the single judge directing a UA certificate failed to properly examine the Vijay-starrer’s case thoroughly.
![[Rarest Of Rare Criteria] "We Will Fail The Victim & Society If Capital Punishment Is Not Awarded": HC Confirms Death Sentence To Convict In 19-Year-Old Engineering Student's Rape-Murder Case](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-15.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Jharkhand: The Jharkhand High Court upheld the previous decision mandating the announcement of dates for municipal elections, dismissing the State Government’s appeal. The court declined to intervene, directing the state to conduct civic elections and announce polling dates within three weeks. The decision came after a writ petition expressing concern over the delay in conducting the elections.
