The Supreme Court will hear Delhi Police’s pleas challenging acquittals in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots on August 26. A related plea seeks action on the Dhingra Committee’s findings of “sham trials.”
Today, On 25th February, Before Sajjan Kumar’s sentencing in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case, some Sikh community members have demanded the death penalty for him. They argue that the crime, involving murder and large-scale violence, qualifies as a ‘rarest of the rare’ case. According to them, he deserves the maximum punishment under the law.
Today, On 10th February, The Supreme Court emphasized that prosecutions for the 1984 anti-Sikh riots must be conducted seriously and not as a mere formality. It stressed the need for genuine legal action to ensure justice for the victims. The court highlighted that such cases should not be handled casually or for appearance’s sake. Proper investigation and accountability are crucial for upholding the rule of law.
The Centre informed the Supreme Court that the trials in the Anti-Sikh riots cases were conducted in a manner that led to the acquittal of the accused. The Supreme Court bench noted that the central government must explain why all the acquittals and dismissals were not appealed in higher courts. This raises concerns about the handling of the cases. The government has been asked to provide clarity on the issue.
Yesterday, On 28th November, A Varanasi court dismissed a plea against Rahul Gandhi for his comments about Sikhs made during a US visit, alleging insecurity among them in India. The court found no basis for legal action, citing a lack of specificity regarding offenses, despite claims that Gandhi’s remarks could incite fear among Sikhs.
Today, On 30th September, Kangana Ranaut agreed to make cuts to her film Emergency, as confirmed by the CBFC to the Bombay High Court. The film faced controversy over its portrayal of the Sikh community. The court hearing was adjourned until October 3 for further assurances regarding the edits and release certification.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a plea challenging the acceptance of a cancellation report in a case against Punjabi singer Gurdas Maan, accused of hurting religious sentiments. The court upheld the lower court’s decision, providing relief to Maan. The case raised questions about evidence examination in legal proceedings and the significance of comprehensive evidence scrutiny in judicial decisions.