Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar questions judiciary’s role in executive appointments, calling CJI’s involvement in selecting CBI Director a violation of constitutional balance.
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar criticized the judiciary for constitutional overreach, urging all institutions in India to respect their defined roles. He emphasized that internal conflicts weaken democracy more than external threats and called for cooperation among the legislature, judiciary, and executive to maintain effective governance and mutual respect within constitutional boundaries.
Subhash Theekkadan, a Kerala lawyer, has requested the Attorney General to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar for his statements made on April 17, 2025, which allegedly undermine the authority of the Supreme Court. Theekkadan argues these remarks threaten judicial independence and public confidence in the judiciary.
![[Bulldozer Justice] "Officials To Pay From Salary": SC Lays Down Pan India Guidelines On Demolition Of Properties](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/image-2024-08-31T101346.318.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court of India today (13th Nov) ruled that demolishing properties of accused individuals is unlawful. In issuing guidelines, the Court emphasized the rule of law, separation of powers, and accountability. No demolition should occur without a proper notice and opportunity for appeal. Officials failing to follow these directives may face personal financial consequences.
Today, On 19th October, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud highlighted the Supreme Court’s role as a people’s court, emphasizing judicial independence and the need to balance with legislative and executive branches. He cautioned against evaluating the court based on outcomes, advocating for access to justice and advancing technology to enhance transparency in judicial processes.
New Delhi: On 2nd May: The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL challenging Arvind Kejriwal’s potential arrest, stating it was not maintainable as he was already in judicial custody. The petition sought to allow undertrial political leaders to campaign virtually and prompt the Election Commission about arrests during the Model Code of Conduct. The court dismissed the PIL, citing a lack of legal understanding and seeking legislative directives.
![[Delhi Excise Policy Scam] ED Opposes Arvind Kejriwal's Interim Bail Plea In Delhi Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/image-292.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today (28th March): The Delhi High Court rejected a PIL aiming to oust Arvind Kejriwal as Delhi Chief Minister after his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate. The Court affirmed that the issue falls under the executive and should be addressed by the President or Governor. It emphasized the separation of powers and refused to intervene in the matter.
Parliamentary Sovereignty in the Spotlight: Sasmit Patra’s Controversial Take on Judiciary’s Role In a riveting and deeply analytical address to the Rajya Sabha, Member of Parliament Sasmit Patra ignited a crucial debate on the delicate balance between legislative authority and judicial oversight in India’s constitutional democracy. Patra’s speech, rich in content and provocative in nature, […]
