SpiceJet Ordered to Pay Rs 25,000 for Issuing Wrong Ticket to Senior Citizen

The Mumbai Consumer Court has ruled against SpiceJet for negligent behavior, ordering the airline to pay Rs 25,000 to a senior citizen. The airline issued incorrect tickets during flight rescheduling in 2020, causing mental distress and financial loss to the passenger. The case highlights the legal responsibility of service providers.

Bombay High Court Appoints Daughters as Guardians of Bedridden Father: Says Courts Can’t Remain Silent in Such Cases

The Bombay High Court appointed two daughters as guardians for their 73-year-old father, who became incapacitated due to brain damage from a cardiac arrest in 2024. Justice Abhay Ahuja emphasized the court’s responsibility to intervene in such distressing situations, highlighting the need for guardianship under special legal provisions for vulnerable individuals.

Chaos at Court Premises| Senior Citizen Suffers Stroke, Hospitalised Immediately

A senior citizen suffered a stroke at the District Court Complex in Belagavi and was found lying helpless in the parking lot. Members of the Young Belgaum Foundation rushed him to the hospital, and he is now out of danger.

Bombay High Court Slams Mumbai Police for Delay in Elderly Woman’s Case Who Lost 32Lakh in Digital Fraud Case

Mumbai, March 19: The Bombay High Court has strongly criticized Mumbai police for not acting quickly on a senior citizen’s complaint about a digital fraud in which she lost Rs 32 lakh. The court said that in cyber fraud cases, immediate action is necessary to prevent further loss and directed the police to improve their response system.

Unnatural Sex With Cow | HC Grants Bail to the Accused Man

The Allahabad High Court has granted conditional bail to Ram Khelawan, a 70-year-old man accused of unnatural sexual acts with a cow. The court considered the seriousness of the charges, potential punishment, and lack of concerns regarding flight or witness intimidation. The defense argued the accused’s innocence and lack of criminal history, while the State counsel’s counterarguments were deemed insubstantial.