The Supreme Court said an accused’s acquittal can be set aside only for “substantial and compelling reasons,” stressing that innocence is strengthened after acquittal. Appellate courts must interfere only in exceptional cases with strong legal grounds.
The Supreme Court set aside an Allahabad High Court order remanding a revenue map correction case, stressing that unnecessary remands only create fresh litigation. The bench said courts must aim to reduce disputes, not reopen settled matters.
The Supreme Court, led by CJI B.R. Gavai, closed the contempt case against a lawyer and litigant who made scandalous allegations against Telangana High Court Judge Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, after their apology was accepted. The bench reminded that “Majesty of law lies in forgiving,” while cautioning lawyers against filing petitions with baseless accusations.
The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to cartoonist Hemant Malviya after he apologised for posting an ‘objectionable’ caricature of PM Modi and the RSS. The Court warned that his bail could be cancelled if he fails to cooperate with the probe.
Supreme Court rejects Presidential Reference under Article 317(1) of the Constitution and finds the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission member not guilty of ‘misbehaviour’, stating, “Actions don’t even meet the threshold of misbehaviour,” ensuring immediate reinstatement.
Supreme Court’s order de-rostering an Allahabad HC judge sparks outrage among top judges. CJI Gavai seeks to resolve breach of judicial norms and natural justice.
Supreme Court cancels jail term of rape convict after confirming he was a juvenile in 1988. His conviction remains valid, but further action will be decided by the Juvenile Justice Board.
Supreme Court urges all High Courts to frame rules mandating disclosure of prior criminal cases in bail applications. Also expunges harsh remarks against a judge, calling them “uncalled for” and passed without hearing him.
Supreme Court, toilet facilities, court infrastructure, 20 High Courts, compliance report, judicial infrastructure, court hygiene, tribunals, public facilities, access to sanitation, registrar general, legal directives, court amenities, SC ruling, judicial accountability
The Supreme Court of India has invalidated a Madhya Pradesh order allowing IAS officers to assess IFS officers’ performance reports, deeming it “contemptuous.” This ruling reaffirms the autonomy of All India Services, emphasizing that roles must adhere to legal frameworks, potentially influencing practices in other states as well.
