Amritpal Singh’s lawyer confirms plans to challenge NSA detention in Supreme Court next week.
The MP is currently lodged in Assam jail under the National Security Act.
The Election Commission told the Supreme Court that the Bihar voter list revision ensures election purity by removing ineligible names. It said Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration card are used only for identification, not proof of citizenship.
Supreme Court to hear if lawyers can be summoned by ED for giving legal advice. Bench led by CJI B.R. Gavai to take up the matter suo motu.
Supreme Court to decide on ex-minister Partha Chatterjee’s bail in the CBI-led cash-for-jobs scam. Case reassigned to a different bench, excluding Justice Joymalya Bagchi.
SC rejects anticipatory bail for two men accused of forcing land sale at gunpoint in Patna. Bench says, “It is not even a case for grant of regular bail.”
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a petition seeking protection of lawyers’ privileges. Advocate Aaditya Gore has been pursuing the Advocates (Protection) Bill since 2014.
Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar stressed the necessity of accurate electoral rolls for democracy during a training session, amid controversy over Bihar’s voter list revision. Opposition parties are contesting the revision in the Supreme Court, citing concerns of disenfranchisement and lack of transparency, while the Election Commission defends the process as essential for electoral integrity.
BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay files PIL urging the Supreme Court to mandate regular special revision of electoral rolls to bar illegal infiltrators from voting. Petition argues that only genuine Indian citizens should influence elections, citing demographic changes across 200 districts.
The Supreme Court will urgently hear a petition from Madhya Pradesh’s OBC community, seeking full implementation of the 27% reservation law passed in 2019, which has not been enforced due to a legal stay. Petitioners argue the government is unjustly limiting OBC reservations to 14%, despite the law’s validity.
The Supreme Court of India will review whether individuals convicted of two murders can serve consecutive life sentences, contrary to a 2016 ruling that mandated they run concurrently. This issue arose during an appeal related to a double murder case and questions the implications of imposing multiple life sentences.
