“Why Treat Assam Differently?” — Supreme Court Questions EC Over Skipping Special Intensive Revision

The Supreme Court has asked the Election Commission to respond to a plea questioning why Assam received only a special revision instead of a Special Intensive Revision of its electoral rolls. The petition alleges discrimination and warns that lakhs of illegal immigrants may remain on Assam’s voter list.

Supreme Court Questions Rajasthan’s Anti-Conversion Law: ‘Is the 2025 Act Constitutional?’

The Supreme Court has asked the Rajasthan government to respond to a plea challenging the constitutional validity of its 2025 anti-conversion law. The petition claims the law is “ultra vires and unconstitutional.”

“35–40 BLOs Have Died by Suicide”: Supreme Court Confronts Alarming Pressure in Special Intensive Revision Drive

The Supreme Court heard pleas on the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision, with lawyers highlighting extreme stress on BLOs, including suicides and FIRs. The Court said States must replace struggling workers and ensure no undue pressure is put on them.

“Why Rush Elections?” Supreme Court Questions Maharashtra, Urges Pause on Local Body Poll Nominations Amid OBC Quota Row

The Supreme Court asked Maharashtra to consider delaying local body poll nominations while it examines the 27% OBC quota issue. The court warned that continuing the process may complicate elections already under legal scrutiny.

Historic Move: Supreme Court Publishes Full Details of Judicial Appointments from Nov 2022 to May 2025

In a historic step for judicial transparency, the Supreme Court has published full details of judge appointments to High Courts and the Supreme Court from November 2022 to May 2025, making the entire process public.

Bombay High Court Rejects Plea Challenging Unlimited Attempts for SC/ST Candidates in Civil Services Exam

The Bombay High Court upheld the constitutionally recognized distinction in reservation criteria for Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidates, dismissing a petition from Dharmendra Kumar, an OBC candidate. The court emphasized that SC/ST candidates are distinct from OBC candidates in terms of civil service examination attempts, affirming existing rules on reservations.

[SHe-Box] Centre Launched Upgraded Sexual Harassment Electronic Box: SC Tells NALSA & Others To Facilitate Women Victims

Union Minister of Women and Child Development had launched a revamped version of SHe-Box on August 29, 2024. The Supreme Court directed NALSA, State Legal Services Authorities, and district and taluka-level bodies to assist women facing workplace sexual harassment in registering complaints before Internal Committees. Justices B V Nagarathna and N Kotiswar Singh highlighted the duty of employers across government, public, and private sectors to ensure the prompt establishment of Internal Complaints Committees as mandated by the POSH Act, 2013.

Rajasthan HC Clarifies Public Setting Requirement for Offences Under SC/ST Act | Insults Must Be Made in Presence of Others

The Rajasthan High Court clarified that for an offence under the SC/ST Act, the insult or intimidation must occur publicly, witnessed by others. The court quashed previous cognizance orders, noting the absence of evidence for a public incident in the case filed by Prithvi Ram against Chhinder Singh, undermining the charges.

Life Sentence Reversed | Supreme Court Upholds Juvenile Claims

The Supreme Court of India has acquitted Brijnandan, sentenced to life for murder, after confirming he was a minor at the time of the crime. This ruling emphasizes that claims of juvenility can be made at any stage of legal proceedings, reinforcing juvenile rights and ensuring their protection under Indian law.

“Govt Should Have Introduced Bill to Overturn Supreme Court’s ‘Creamy Layer’ Observation”: Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge

Asserting that the idea of denying reservation to SCs and STs on account of the creamy layer concept is “condemnable”, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge Today (August 10th) said the government should have brought legislation in Parliament to nullify the part of the recent Supreme Court judgment that talks about the issue.