TV actor T. Ravichandran has approached the Madras High Court for anticipatory bail after being booked by CCB for allegedly threatening to “slit the throat” of MP Kamal Haasan. The court has adjourned the plea to August 20.
Today, On 6th March, A Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, ruled that no further FIRs can be registered against Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin over his remarks on Sanatana Dharma without its permission. The court is hearing his plea to consolidate multiple criminal cases filed across different states. Stalin’s comments, comparing Sanatana Dharma to diseases like dengue and malaria, triggered widespread controversy. The court extended interim protection and scheduled the next hearing for a later date.
Abhinav Arora, a 10-year-old spiritual content creator from Delhi, is involved in a legal case against YouTubers allegedly trolling him. His advocate revealed they received serious threats linked to the Lawrence Bishnoi group. Family members expressed concern for his safety, emphasizing his innocence amid ongoing social media campaigns against him.
Today, On 14th August, The Supreme Court granted Udhayanidhi Stalin exemption from personally appearing in cases related to his controversial ‘Sanatana Dharma’ remark. The court instructed opposing petitioners to submit arguments in writing, addressing multiple cases filed against him. The court also issued a notice regarding his plea to consolidate the criminal cases filed in various states.
The Karnataka High Court, on Friday(June 21), temporarily halted criminal proceedings against three organizers of a Chennai event where controversial remarks on Sanatana Dharma were made by DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin. Justice Krishna S Dixit’s decision offers interim relief until the court hears the organizers’ petition to dismiss the case.
Today(on 10th May), The Supreme Court addressed Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea to consolidate cases over his Sanatana Dharma comments. Notices were issued to states and complainants after a petition amendment. The Court’s consistent stance on Stalin’s remarks highlights the legal scrutiny and widespread repercussions, emphasizing responsible speech and the need for social harmony.
Today(on1st April),The Supreme Court rejected Udhayanidhi Stalin’s plea to consolidate complaints against him, differentiating his remarks on Sanatana Dharma from media statements. Despite his legal comparisons and representations, the court directed him to amend his plea and scheduled the next hearing for early May. Stalin’s controversial remarks continue to evoke legal responses and public reactions.
The Madras High Court Today rejected ‘quo warranto’ petitions against DMK Ministers Udhayanidhi Stalin, P K Sekar Babu, and MP A Raja, dismissing challenges to their eligibility stemming from alleged disparaging remarks about Sanatana Dharma. Justice Anita Sumanth emphasized the responsibility of public officials to verify historical facts and maintain decorum, highlighting the court’s stance on free speech and public office conduct.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin’s son Udhayanidhi Stalin had last year triggered a massive row after comparing Sanatana dharma with “dengue” and “malaria”, saying that it should not just be opposed, but “eradicated”. The Supreme Court Today (4 March) criticized DMK leader Stalin for his comments on Sanatana Dharma, stating that he had “misused his privileges”.