Delhi High Court hears plea highlighting that same-sex partners are “effectively powerless” to make medical decisions for each other. Petitioner argues current rules only allow “husband or wife” to give medical consent, violating constitutional rights.
Today(on 9th July), Petitioners sought an open court hearing before a three-judge bench, led by CJI Chandrachud, to review the denial of marriage equality to the queer community by the Supreme Court. The petition challenges the Supreme Court’s decision against legalizing same-sex marriage in India, emphasizing the fundamental right to marry for all individuals, regardless of sexual orientation.
![[BREAKING] Same Sex Marriage | Justice Sanjeev Khanna Recused Himself from the Hearing Citing Personal Reasons](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-33-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court will review 13 petitions challenging the 2023 verdict on same-sex marriage in India. A specially constituted five-judge bench, including Chief Justice Chandrachud, will consider the petitions. The review aims for a more inclusive interpretation of marriage laws to encompass same-sex couples. Justices Khanna and Nagarathna have replaced retired Justices Kaul and Bhat.
Chief Justice Dr DY Chandrachud emphasized the judiciary’s selective role in societal disputes, clarifying the absence of direct governmental pressure during his term. He underlined the importance of Parliament legislating marriage laws, especially in the context of same-sex unions. Moreover, he highlighted the ongoing dialogue between the judiciary, litigants, and civil society, advocating for livestreaming constitutional cases.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud “If by political pressure you mean pressure from the government, I can tell you that in my 24 years as a judge, I have never felt any political pressure from those in power. This is because, in India, our democratic traditions ensure that we live lives relatively isolated from the political arm of the government.”
Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, speaking at an event in London, stated that in his 24 years as a judge, he has never felt direct political pressure from the government. He emphasized the need for judges to consider the societal and political impacts of their decisions. CJI also discussed the impact of technology on the judiciary, addressing social media criticism and the need for legislative audits to assess laws’ impact on the judicial system.
The Congress party’s election manifesto includes a proposed law for civil unions for LGBTQ+ couples, demonstrating a commitment to equality. Congress Poll Manifesto Includes Law on Civil Unions for Queer Couples, also addresses women’s cash transfers, youth employment, and caste census. This move reflects the party’s progressive approach to social issues, shaping the upcoming elections with a focus on LGBTQ+ rights, among other key promises.
In a pivotal development, review petitions have been submitted against the Supreme Court’s judgment which declined to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriages in India. The Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud and comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, S Ravindra Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha, had ruled on October […]
In a recent discussion, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud reaffirmed his stance on the Supreme Court’s ruling concerning same-sex marriage. He described judgments on Constitutional matters as often being a “vote of conscience.” Also read- Supreme Court Directs End To Queer Discrimination: A Comprehensive Overview (lawchakra.in) The CJI’s comments came during the 3rd […]