Today, On 19th November, The Kerala High Court criticised the poor crowd control at Sabarimala, noting that the situation went out of control due to a complete lack of proper coordination among officials. The court demanded immediate corrective measures from the administration.
Kerala High Court has permitted the SIT to collect gold samples and inspect the Sreekovil door amid allegations of massive gold misappropriation at Sabarimala temple. The court said, “The investigation must reach everyone who was part of the gold theft, directly or indirectly.”
The Kerala High Court has directed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate a larger conspiracy behind the Sabarimala temple gold theft, implicating TDB officials and Unnikrishnan Potty in the disappearance of gold from Dwarapalaka idols.
Kerala High Court conducted an in-camera hearing today regarding the alleged loss of gold from the Dwarapalaka idols at Sabarimala temple. The Court restricted public and media access, keeping the sensitive proceedings completely confidential.
The Kerala High Court has cautioned the media against speculative reporting on the alleged loss of gold from Sabarimala temple’s Dwarapalaka idols. The Court stressed protecting the investigation and rights of the accused while keeping the public informed.
Kerala High Court has ordered an SIT probe into the Sabarimala gold loss row, appointing ADGP H Venkatesh to lead the investigation. The case involves alleged missing gold from the ‘Dwarapalaka idols’ at the famous temple.
Kerala High Court has asked the Vigilance Officer to investigate the 4 kg gold loss from Sabarimala idols. Court stressed a transparent inquiry to uncover the truth.
The Kerala High Court directed the filing of an FIR against a man who raised funds for idol installation at Sabarimala temple. The court questioned, “What is the action taken by the Board apart from our directions?”
Today, On 31st January, The Supreme Court declined to hear a PIL challenging VIP darshans at temples. While the court agreed that such special treatment should not be given, it stated that it could not pass orders on the matter. The judges acknowledged concerns over fairness in temple access. However, they emphasized that regulating religious practices is beyond their jurisdiction.
The Kerala High Court upheld the Travancore Devaswom Board’s mandate that the Melshanthi (High Priest) at Sabarimala Temple must be from the Malayala Brahmin community. The court dismissed challenges citing inadequate pleadings and affirmed the caste criteria. Controversy surrounds the constitutional rights and appointment process for this position. (Word count: 49)
