The Delhi High Court has asked the Centre to respond to a petition demanding accessible TV content for visually impaired and hearing-impaired viewers. The plea says lack of audio description, captions and sign language violates disability rights under the RPwD Act.
The Supreme Court has sought a response from Uttarakhand for excluding blind and locomotor-disabled candidates from judicial exams. Justice Pardiwala called the state’s move “very bad” and issued urgent fresh notices.
The Supreme Court has issued a notice regarding an appeal challenging the limited reservation benefits for individuals with disabilities, applicable only during direct recruitment. The Delhi High Court previously ruled in favor of broader promotion benefits, but this decision is now under review. Key observations by Justice Surya Kant emphasize the importance of seniority for specially-abled candidates.
Former Chief Justice DY Chandrachud highlighted personal and societal challenges faced by individuals with disabilities during a panel discussion. He shared his family’s journey in accommodating his daughters’ needs while advocating for greater empathy in the judiciary. He emphasized inclusivity, proposed reforms to disability laws, and the importance of mental health awareness.
Today, On 21st February, The Supreme Court criticized the requirement that MBBS candidates must have “both hands intact,” calling it discriminatory. While acknowledging that it cannot override expert opinions, the Court emphasized the need for flexibility. It stressed the importance of reasonable accommodation to ensure inclusivity in medical education. This ruling highlights the need for a more equitable approach in eligibility criteria.
The Kerala High Court that persons with disabilities are not entitled to reservations for government pleader and public prosecutor positions. The court emphasized that these roles require specific qualifications and are not subject to the usual reservation policies. It further stated that no one has an inherent right to be appointed to these posts. The verdict clarifies the legal position on disability reservations in such appointments.
Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, born on November 30, 1961, in Bhopal, joined the Supreme Court of India on November 9, 2023, after serving in various judicial positions, including Chief Justice of Telangana and Delhi High Courts. He has expertise in constitutional, civil, and criminal law, with notable judgments advancing rights for persons with disabilities.
The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, directed the Union government to rectify legal flaws regarding accessibility for disabled individuals under the RPWD Act. The Court emphasized the need for mandatory accessibility rules instead of non-enforceable guidelines, ordering compliance within three months and stakeholder consultations for effective implementation.
