The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that maintaining continuous reservation without reassessing seniority violates constitutional equality, emphasizing that general category employees must receive fair recognition and pay parity once they reach the same post as reserved category juniors.
CJI B.R. Gavai enjoyed a camel ride through the sandy deserts of Bikaner, Rajasthan, soaking in the royal ambiance and natural beauty. Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal also joined, experiencing the unique landscape and local culture alongside the Chief Justice. Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal made a noteworthy visit […]
AAP MLA moved the Supreme Court challenging the Waqf Amendment Bill, following similar opposition from Congress and AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi. The bill seeks to amend the Waqf Act of 1995, which governs the administration of Waqf properties across India. Opposition parties have raised concerns over its potential impact on minority rights and property management. The legal challenge reflects growing resistance to the bill from multiple political fronts.
Today, On 21st February, The Supreme Court sought the Centre’s response to a petition calling for improved healthcare for the tribal population. The plea highlights disparities in medical access and urges government intervention. Advocates argue that targeted policies are needed to address critical health challenges in tribal communities. The court’s decision could pave the way for better healthcare initiatives for marginalized groups.
NEW DELHI: On February 10, 2025, the Supreme Court of India declared the 2010 recruitment process conducted by the Jharkhand government for Class-IV employees to be “illegal” and “unconstitutional”. The Court quashed the entire recruitment process, ordering the state government to issue new advertisements for these positions within six months.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India ruled on Wednesday(29th Jan) that reserving seats in postgraduate (PG) medical courses based on domicile or residence within a state is against the right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution. The Court emphasized that admissions must be strictly based on merit.
![[BREAKING] Hindu Group Moves Supreme Court to Challenge 1991 Places of Worship Law](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Places-of-worship-act.webp?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
NEW DELHI: Today(6th Jan): A Hindu group, the Akhil Bhartiya Sant Samiti, has approached the Supreme Court to challenge the constitutional validity of the 1991 Places of Worship Act, claiming it infringes on fundamental rights and prevents communities from reclaiming religious sites. The law maintains the status quo of religious places since 1947, excluding disputes related to the Babri Masjid.