Newslaundry Journalists Sue Abhijit Iyer-Mitra for Calling Them ‘Prostitutes’ in Viral Posts

Nine women journalists from Newslaundry have filed a Rs 2 crore defamation suit against Abhijit Iyer-Mitra in the Delhi High Court, alleging he called them “prostitutes” and labeled their workplace a “brothel” in offensive social media posts. They seek an apology, compensation, and accountability for online abuse, emphasizing the impact on their dignity and mental health.

YouTuber Shyam Meera Singh Removes Video Alleging False Claims Against Isha Foundation: Delhi High Court

The petition filed by Isha Foundation, which claims that various videos and online posts are spreading “false and motivated propaganda” against the organization. NEW DELHI: On Friday, 9th May, YouTuber and journalist Shyam Meera Singh informed the Delhi High Court that he had removed his video containing allegations against Isha Foundation and its founder Jaggi […]

Supreme Court Panel Begins Inquiry into Alleged Cash Discovery at Justice Yashwant Varma’s Residence

New Delhi: 25th March, A three-member committee, appointed by the Supreme Court, has started an inquiry into the alleged discovery of cash at the official residence of Delhi High Court judge, Justice Yashwant Varma. The committee members reached his residence on Tuesday and carried out an inspection, sources said.

Kerala High Court: No Automatic Presumption That Woman’s Complaint is ‘Gospel Truth’ in Criminal Cases

Kerala: The Kerala High Court ruled that in criminal cases, including sexual offenses, there should be no automatic presumption that a woman’s complaint is completely true. The court noted that nowadays, there is a growing trend of falsely implicating innocent people in such matters.

Court Postpones Hearing in AAP’s Leader Satyender Jain’s Defamation Case Against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj

New Delhi, February 22: A Delhi court has postponed the hearing of a civil defamation case filed by former Delhi minister and AAP leader Satyender Jain against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj.

[Defamation Case Against Rahul Gandhi] Madras HC Directs Publishers of Junior Vikatan to Pay Rs.25 Lakh Compensation to DMK Leader T.R. Baalu

Madras: The Madras High Court directed the Tamil magazine Junior Vikatan to pay Rs 25 lakh as compensation to Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader TR Baalu. The Court found that the magazine had published defamatory and false news against him without verifying facts. The ruling was passed by Justice AA Nakkiran on February 4, 2025.

Satyendar Jain Defamation Case: BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj’s Lawyer Claims “Complaint Politically Motivated”

Satyendar Jain has filed a defamation suit against BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj over allegations she made during a television interview, labeling him as “corrupt” and a “fraud.” Jain claims these false statements have severely harmed his reputation. The case, viewed as politically motivated, is ongoing with hearings scheduled until January 2025.

Defamation Case By AAP’s Satyendra Jain | Rouse Avenue Court Gives One-Week Time to BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj to File Response

The Rouse Avenue Court has given BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj one week to file her response in a defamation case. The case involves allegations made against her, and the court has allowed time for her to present her side. This development is part of ongoing legal proceedings. The court’s decision ensures both sides have an opportunity to be heard fairly.

Delhi Court Issues Defamation Notice To BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj After AAP’s Satyendra Jain Files Complaint

NEW DELHI: Today (16th Dec): The Rouse Avenue Court in Delhi has issued a criminal defamation notice to BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj following AAP leader Satyendar Jain’s allegations of defamatory remarks made during a TV interview on October 5, 2023. Jain accuses Swaraj of damaging his reputation through false claims regarding seized assets, prompting legal proceedings scheduled for December 20.

“Stealing Original Artistic Works By AI Software”: Delhi HC To Hear PIL On March, 2025

The Delhi High Court is set to hear a PIL concerning unauthorized use of artistic works by AI, linked to deepfake technology. Petitioners seek amendments to copyright laws, regulations for AI use, and protection for original content. They argue this misuse violates rights and raises privacy issues, particularly for women depicted in deepfakes.