Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Over Facebook Post Using ‘Jihadi’, Finds No Outraging Of Religious Sentiments

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Over Facebook Post using the term “jihadi”: a plain reading of the message did not attract Sections 295A and 505(2) IPC, the Court said. Bengaluru: Criminal proceedings against the operator of a Facebook page, registered under Sections 295A and 505(2) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), cannot continue, the Karnataka […]

A Charge-Sheet In A Non-Cognizable Case Must Be Treated As A Complaint: Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Summoning Order In A ‘Santa Cap’ Row

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a Magistrate’s order summoning an accused on a police charge-sheet under Sections 298 and 504 IPC, holding that since those offences are non-cognizable, the charge-sheet must, under the Explanation to Section 2(d) CrPC, be treated as a complaint and decided as a complaint case. The case arose from an FIR over a store’s alleged instruction to employees to wear a ‘Santa Claus red cap’; the Court also warned against workplace directions that hurt religious sentiments.

Whether The Posts Are Protected Satire Or Cross Into Crime Needs Investigation: Delhi Court Orders FIR Against An X User Over Series Of Posts

A Delhi court has directed registration of an FIR against a user of X over a series of posts alleged to be derogatory to Hindu religious beliefs, historical figures and the Prime Minister. Notably, the cyber police had reported the posts to be largely political and historical commentary, criticism and satire, with no evidence of deliberate incitement. The court ordered an FIR under Section 175(3) BNSS to allow investigation, expressing no opinion on the merits.

Sabarimala Deities Remarks: Kerala HC Views Video In Court, Orders Temporary Blocking Of Social Media Clip

The Kerala High Court, after viewing the video in open court, directed the temporary blocking of a social media clip containing remarks about the Sabarimala deities, holding prima facie that the allegation of scandalous and indecent speech stood substantiated. Kochi: The Kerala High Court on Thursday directed the temporary blocking of a social media video […]

“Have Faith in Our System”: Supreme Court Refuses Oral Plea Against Nazia Elahi Khan Over Prophet Remarks

The Supreme Court declined an oral plea seeking immediate action against BJP Minority Morcha leader Nazia Elahi Khan over alleged remarks about Prophet Muhammad. The Court advised filing a proper petition, emphasising that sensitive matters must proceed through established legal procedures rather than informal requests.

Can Dressing Your Pet Dog As Lord Krishna Be An Offence Under Section 298 BNS?: P&H High Court Says, No

The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed an FIR against a woman accused of hurting religious sentiments after she dressed up her pet dog as Lord Krishna for Janmashtami and shared the photo on WhatsApp. The Court held that an act done out of genuine love and devotion does not constitute an offence under Section 298 of the BNS.

Any Disregard Will Be Taken Sternly: Delhi HC Gives Centre 15-Day Deadline on Removing Dhruv Rathee’s Hindu Deities Video

The Delhi High Court directed the Grievance Appellate Committee to decide within 15 days an appeal seeking removal of Dhruv Rathee’s YouTube video alleging Hindu deities consumed meat and alcohol. The Court warned that any non-compliance with its order would be viewed seriously.

Bombay High Court Quashes Hate-Speech FIR Against Shekhar Suman and Bharti Singh: No Intent to Outrage Religious Feelings

The Bombay High Court ruled that the comedy show line “Ya Allah! Rasgulla! Dahi Bhalla!” did not intend to hurt religious sentiments. It quashed the 2010 FIR filed against actors Shekhar Suman and Bharati Singh in the case.