The Madras High Court ordered strict security arrangements during Madurai’s Lord Kallazhagar procession, condemning alleged chappal-throwing incidents against devotees as an affront to faith, customary religious practices, and the secular fraternity forming part of India’s constitutional ethos.
The Supreme Court of India observed that if every religious practice or ritual is challenged before constitutional courts, it could lead to excessive litigation, weakening religions and affecting India’s civilizational fabric, while stressing that religion remains deeply connected with the country’s social structure.
The High Court rejected a plea seeking permission to use loudspeakers On top of a mosque. It stated that religious places are meant for offering prayers, and the use of loudspeakers cannot be considered a fundamental right. The court emphasized maintaining peace and harmony. This ruling highlights the balance between religious practices and public order.
![[BMC vs. Bombay HC] HC Denies To Stay BMC's Slaughter Permission At Private Places On Bakri Eid](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/image-5-2.png?resize=447%2C360&ssl=1)
Today, On 13th June, The Bombay High Court declined to halt BMC’s authorization for animal slaughter at private locations during Bakri Eid. Despite challenge by Jiv Maitri Trust, highlighting violations of central acts, the court emphasized lodging complaints for policy violations. This ruling underscores the balance between religious practices and regulatory policies.
The Kerala High Court rejected the plea of a 10-year-old girl from Bengaluru seeking permission to visit Sabarimala Temple. The court stated that since the matter is pending before the Supreme Court, the petitioner cannot invoke the writ jurisdiction of the High Court. The girl’s plea was based on her prepubescent status, but it was ultimately dismissed.
