The Chhattisgarh High Court held that courts cannot direct the State to create new posts or modify service rules to provide promotional avenues as it falls under government policy. The plea of long-serving Laboratory Technicians was dismissed as legally unsustainable.
A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court against the quashing of the amendment to the MP Higher Judicial Service Rules, stating, “The amendment is not a new recruitment method, but only a conditional adjustment within the framework.”
The Madras High Court upheld SBI’s decision to cancel the appointment of a Circle Based Officer after a CIBIL report showed major loan defaults. Justice N. Mala dismissed the candidate’s writ petition, backing the bank’s stance on financial integrity.
The Supreme Court ruled that eligibility criteria for government recruitment cannot be changed mid-process or after it begins, reaffirming the K Manjusree v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2008) decision. This ensures adherence to constitutional principles of equality and non-discrimination in public employment while maintaining the integrity of the recruitment process.
The Supreme Court allowed 700 teachers terminated by the Tripura government to challenge their dismissal in the High Court due to alleged unlawful and unconstitutional termination orders. Advocates alleged a massive scam, involving ongoing salary disbursements and misappropriation. The decision provides an opportunity to address the situation and challenge the government’s actions.
