A JEE (Main) 2025 candidate filed a petition in the Delhi High Court, alleging missing responses and errors in the answer key by the NTA. The student seeks a probe, re-evaluation of his answers, and improved grievance mechanisms, highlighting recurring issues that affect many candidates’ academic prospects in future evaluations.
![[CLAT 2025 Questions Errors] Single Judge 'Charitable' in Calling CLAT Questions 'Demonstrably Wrong': Delhi HC](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CLAT-2025-Question-Errors-_-Law-Aspirant-Files-An-Appeal-In-Delhi-HC-Challenging-Single-Judges-Verdict.jpeg?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Delhi High Court, On Tuesday(24th Dec) led by Acting CJ Vibhu Bhakru, addressed a challenge to CLAT 2025 regarding errors in the English comprehension section. Justice Jyoti Singh had previously identified mistakes affecting candidates’ results and mandated revisions. The NLU Consortium has since contested this judgment, claiming it overstepped judicial boundaries.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued stay the recruitment of civil judges based on the 2022 examination results. The decision temporarily suspends the hiring process, pending further review. The court’s intervention raises questions about the examination’s integrity and fairness. The Madhya Pradesh High Court issued a notable directive, pausing the ongoing recruitment process for the […]
Today, 21st May, The Supreme Court dismissed a plea for re-evaluation of Punjab Judicial Services Mains Exam marks, citing lack of authority. Petitioners requested reconsideration based on discrepancies, but the Court upheld the existing process and advised them to approach the Punjab & Haryana High Court under Article 226 for redress, subsequently granting permission to withdraw the petition.