CJI Gavai cautioned that judges accepting government posts or contesting elections soon after retirement “raises ethical concerns and invites public scrutiny,” stressing the need to protect judicial independence and maintain public trust in the justice system.
On his final day, CJI Sanjiv Khanna emphasized the legal profession’s “truth deficit,” urging both Bar and Bench to prioritize public trust and uphold integrity. He articulated that judges should neither dominate nor surrender in the courtroom. Khanna plans to remain engaged in the legal field post-retirement without taking official roles.
Former supreme court judge Justice Markandey Katju raised doubts over the allegations against Justice Yashwant Verma, calling it a conspiracy. He suggested that the money was planted to frame him, rather than being a genuine bribe. Katju also hinted at the possible involvement of someone from Verma’s staff in the incident. This statement highlights a different perspective amid the ongoing controversy.
The Advocates’ Association of Bengaluru will convene on March 24 to address judicial corruption, emphasizing the need for a robust system to remove corrupt judges. Key proposals include mandatory asset declarations, a fast-track removal system, and enhanced judicial accountability. These measures aim to restore public trust in the legal system.
NEW DELHI: CJI Sanjiv Khanna took the matter very seriously and convened a collegium meeting. He remarked, “बहुत गंभीर” (“very serious”) and suggested that Justice Verma should be transferred. According to reports, Justice Yashwant Verma was not at home when a fire broke out at his residence. His wife immediately called the fire brigade. While extinguishing the fire, firefighters stumbled upon stacks of currency notes in one of the rooms. The police and Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna were informed about the incident.
Today, On 11th February, The Calcutta High Court emphasized that corruption in influential positions significantly undermines public confidence while hearing the RG Kar case. The court stressed the need for transparency and accountability in governance to maintain trust in public institutions. Allegations of corruption in the case have raised concerns over ethical misconduct in administrative affairs. The court’s remarks highlight the broader impact of corruption on society and the justice system.
During the hearing, the special CBI judge questioned the agency for not providing all documents to Sandip Ghosh. However, the judge also scolded Ghosh’s lawyer, stating, “We’re not here to find faults with either side.This is not a political platform where you can raise your voice. You cannot speak like this against an agency. Submit your concerns in writing.” The court maintained that legal arguments must follow proper procedures.