Bombay High Court seeks CBFC’s explanation for denying certification to Ajey: The Untold Story of a Yogi. Judges ask, “If no objection was taken to the book, how could a film inspired by it disturb public order?”
The Supreme Court of India commended Tamil Nadu for utilizing preventive detention laws to combat cybercrime, emphasizing that traditional laws are inadequate. The acknowledgment arose during a case involving Abhijeet Singh, accused of defrauding Rs 84.5 lakh. The court will continue hearing the case on June 25, 2025.
The Calcutta High Court permitted BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari to visit Murshidabad, following recent violence related to the Waqf Act, but mandated he inform the local Superintendent of Police beforehand. The Court forbade any rallies or public speeches during the visit to maintain peace, amid opposition from the West Bengal government.
The Rajasthan High Court criticized the FIR against Arnab Goswami, calling it an attempt to suppress journalistic freedom. The case was filed based on a complaint by Congress leader Pawan Khera. It relates to Republic Bharat’s coverage of a temple demolition in Rajgarh, Alwar. The court’s remarks highlight concerns over press freedom and political influence in legal actions.
Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court dismissed a PIL requesting guidelines against hate speech, emphasizing its distinct nature from misinformation. The court clarified that grievances should be raised through lawful channels, rejecting calls for stricter regulations and training for political figures addressing provocative statements threatening national security and unity.
West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee’s statement during a recent event has sparked controversy, leading lawyer Vineet Jindal to file a complaint with Delhi Police. Jindal alleges that her remarks, hinting at potential unrest in several states including Delhi, are provocative and could threaten national harmony. He is seeking action under specific sections of the law.