Today, On 18th November, the Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking the release of policy documents for Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana beneficiaries. The court found no merit in claims regarding two-thirds of policyholders missing out on benefits, citing assumptions instead of evidence, and warned against potential fraudulent claims.
Today, On 14th November, the Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation seeking to ban WhatsApp for non-compliance with new IT Rules. The petition, which raised security concerns and questioned the app’s encryption, was rejected by the Court, allowing WhatsApp to continue its operations despite claims of potential risks and misinformation.
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court rejected a petition by activist K.A. Paul for a CBI investigation into alleged adulteration of Tirupati Laddu, citing the impracticality of creating separate states for religious matters. Previous claims of animal fat usage in the laddus caused political conflict, with ongoing investigations managed by a Special Investigation Team.
Today, On 6th November, The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought permission to conduct Chhath Puja on the banks of the Yamuna River. The court cited the severe pollution levels in the Yamuna, stating that it would be unsafe for people to enter the river’s waters for the festival. Observing potential health risks, the court emphasized the need to protect public safety. The decision highlights ongoing concerns about the Yamuna’s pollution levels and its impact on public gatherings.the Delhi High Court rejected a Public Interest Litigation seeking permission for Chhath Puja on the Yamuna River banks due to severe pollution posing health risks. The court emphasized public safety, underlining ongoing concerns about the river’s contamination and its implications for public gatherings and rituals associated with the festival.
A Supreme Court petition challenges the Election Commission of India’s decision to raise the maximum voters per polling booth to 1,500. Advocates argue this limits voting access and propose reducing the number to 1,200, enhancing accessibility. The case highlights significant concerns about electoral fairness and democratic processes in India.
Yesterday, On 22nd October, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, agreed to hear a petition for adopting hybrid mode hearings in family courts across India. The petition highlights delays in case resolutions affecting women and children, advocating for timely justice through a combination of virtual and physical appearances, addressing logistical challenges.
Today, On 18th October, the Supreme Court rejected a petition for a regulatory board to oversee OTT platforms in India, citing insufficient grounds. The court noted existing self-regulation under IT Rules 2021. Advocates raised concerns about unchecked content on OTT services compared to traditional media, highlighting risks to national security and public safety.
Today, On 1st October, a Public Interest Litigation was filed in the Delhi High Court challenging the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk and fellow activists during a peaceful march. The case will be heard on October 3, highlighting concerns about activist detention and regional issues in Ladakh, such as political representation and environmental protection.
Amit Vyas, representing Coldplay fans in India, has filed a criminal complaint with Mumbai’s Economic Offences Wing against BookMyShow and Live Nation, alleging ticketing fraud for the band’s upcoming concerts. He claims unethical practices and manipulation enabled ticket bots to thrive, depriving genuine fans of access and leading to inflated resale prices.
![[IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack] PIL to Ban Netflix Series Withdrawn After Disclaimer Update](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-2-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A petition to ban Netflix’s “IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack” series was withdrawn from the Delhi High Court after Netflix added a disclaimer. The petitioner raised concerns about the portrayal of the hijackers and sought a ban, claiming it misrepresented historical events and offended Hindu sentiments. Netflix has committed to updating the disclaimer with the real names of the hijackers.