![[Justice Shekhar Yadav’s ‘Majority’ Remark] "Motion is Invalid & Attacks Freedom of Speech": PIL Challenges Impeachment](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/image-20-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A PIL has been filed against the impeachment motion of Justice Shekhar K. Yadav, arguing that his comments at a VHP meeting were misinterpreted and do not constitute hate speech. The petition emphasizes judicial independence and free speech rights, asserting that the allegations do not meet constitutional standards for judicial removal.
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL by Tsunami On Roads, seeking oil companies to use CSR funds for enhancing public transport in polluted cities like Delhi. While the court rejected the direct allocation, it allowed the petitioner to approach authorities like the EPCA for consideration of their proposal regarding air pollution mitigation.
Today, On 16th December, the Allahabad High Court reviewed Sushil Singhania’s anticipatory bail plea related to an abetment to suicide case involving his estranged nephew Atul Subhash. Senior Advocate Tiwari raised concerns about media influence, while the court discussed jurisdiction and evidence. Atul’s suicide note implicated his wife and others, leading to ongoing legal proceedings.
Today, On 13th December, the Supreme Court rejected a PIL regarding voting rights for expatriate citizens, stating it lacked jurisdiction to compel Parliament. Petitioner Savya Sachi Krishnan Nigam highlighted a stalled Election Commission proposal from 2020. The court permitted him to withdraw the petition, suggesting alternative forums for the issue.
Today, On 11th December, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on stubble burning due to a similar case pending in the Supreme Court. The High Court stressed avoiding conflicting judgments and allowed petitioners to approach the Supreme Court. Stubble burning’s impact on air quality remains a critical issue under review.
The Supreme Court today (6th Dec) has issued a notice regarding a petition seeking protections for Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) members in private companies against arbitrary actions and retaliation. The petition argues that the lack of safeguards violates constitutional rights and calls for ICC members to be classified as public servants, ensuring their independence and safety.
The Supreme Court directed immediate action to fill vacancies in the Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions, vital for the Right to Information Act’s implementation. A status report regarding these vacancies was requested from various states, with a next hearing set for December 17, 2024, emphasizing the importance of prompt appointments.
Today, On 2nd November, Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna will hear a PIL against the Election Commission’s decision to raise the maximum voter count per polling booth from 1,200 to 1,500. Petitioner Indu Prakash Singh argues this could lead to overcrowding and marginalization of disadvantaged groups, prolonging voting times and reducing turnout.
The Gujarat High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the inclusion of the Bhagavad Gita in school curriculums, labeling it as propaganda. The court argued that the Gita’s teachings provide moral guidance akin to moral science, supporting the state’s decision to implement this educational initiative without religious bias.
Today, On 18th November, the Bombay High Court upheld the ban on mobile phones inside polling booths, asserting its legality. A PIL argued for phone use for identity verification via the DigiLocker app but was dismissed. The court emphasized that the ban supports election integrity and prevents misuse of technology, marking it as constitutional.