![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court rejected a petition by activist K.A. Paul for a CBI investigation into alleged adulteration of Tirupati Laddu, citing the impracticality of creating separate states for religious matters. Previous claims of animal fat usage in the laddus caused political conflict, with ongoing investigations managed by a Special Investigation Team.
Today, On 6th November, The Delhi High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought permission to conduct Chhath Puja on the banks of the Yamuna River. The court cited the severe pollution levels in the Yamuna, stating that it would be unsafe for people to enter the river’s waters for the festival. Observing potential health risks, the court emphasized the need to protect public safety. The decision highlights ongoing concerns about the Yamuna’s pollution levels and its impact on public gatherings.the Delhi High Court rejected a Public Interest Litigation seeking permission for Chhath Puja on the Yamuna River banks due to severe pollution posing health risks. The court emphasized public safety, underlining ongoing concerns about the river’s contamination and its implications for public gatherings and rituals associated with the festival.
A Supreme Court petition challenges the Election Commission of India’s decision to raise the maximum voters per polling booth to 1,500. Advocates argue this limits voting access and propose reducing the number to 1,200, enhancing accessibility. The case highlights significant concerns about electoral fairness and democratic processes in India.
Yesterday, On 22nd October, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, agreed to hear a petition for adopting hybrid mode hearings in family courts across India. The petition highlights delays in case resolutions affecting women and children, advocating for timely justice through a combination of virtual and physical appearances, addressing logistical challenges.
Today, On 18th October, the Supreme Court rejected a petition for a regulatory board to oversee OTT platforms in India, citing insufficient grounds. The court noted existing self-regulation under IT Rules 2021. Advocates raised concerns about unchecked content on OTT services compared to traditional media, highlighting risks to national security and public safety.
Today, On 1st October, a Public Interest Litigation was filed in the Delhi High Court challenging the detention of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk and fellow activists during a peaceful march. The case will be heard on October 3, highlighting concerns about activist detention and regional issues in Ladakh, such as political representation and environmental protection.
Amit Vyas, representing Coldplay fans in India, has filed a criminal complaint with Mumbai’s Economic Offences Wing against BookMyShow and Live Nation, alleging ticketing fraud for the band’s upcoming concerts. He claims unethical practices and manipulation enabled ticket bots to thrive, depriving genuine fans of access and leading to inflated resale prices.
![[IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack] PIL to Ban Netflix Series Withdrawn After Disclaimer Update](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-2-2.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A petition to ban Netflix’s “IC 814: The Kandahar Hijack” series was withdrawn from the Delhi High Court after Netflix added a disclaimer. The petitioner raised concerns about the portrayal of the hijackers and sought a ban, claiming it misrepresented historical events and offended Hindu sentiments. Netflix has committed to updating the disclaimer with the real names of the hijackers.
Today, On 5th September, The Delhi High Court ordered the Delhi Development Authority to compensate the families of a mother and son who tragically died after falling into an open drain in Ghazipur. The court instructed the DDA to pay Rs 20 lakh as a humanitarian gesture. The incident raised concerns about safety measures in the area, prompting the court’s decision.
![[Setback For Kangana Ranaut] ‘Emergency’ to Miss Sept 6 Release: HC Refuses to Direct CBFC to Issue Censor Certificate Immediately](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image-14-1.png?resize=400%2C225&ssl=1)
Today, On 3rd September, the Madhya Pradesh High Court declined to halt the release of Kangana Ranaut’s movie “Emergency,” scheduled for this Friday, but directed the CBFC to consider objections before granting a censor certificate. The PIL filed by Sikh groups raised concerns about the movie. The Court dismissed the petition but instructed the CBFC to address the objections.