Today, On 18th March, The Supreme Court, led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, addressed concerns over delays in resolving CBI and CVC cases. Emphasizing judicial discretion, CJI Khanna stated, “We cannot issue blanket directions. You may approach the High Court as well.” The court acknowledged that closure reports are sometimes filed, but further investigations can be permitted. The remarks came during a PIL hearing, highlighting the judiciary’s stance on case proceedings.
Today, On 17th March, The Supreme Court sought a response from the Centre on a PIL challenging the current process of appointing the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG). The petition also requests that the CAG be appointed by the President in consultation with an independent and neutral selection committee. The PIL argues that the current appointment process lacks transparency and independence.
The Madras High Court expressed confidence that divine blessings will support the development of a metro station, even if temple land is acquired. The judge stated that the metro project would benefit lakhs of people and hoped that God would show kindness toward this public cause. The court emphasized that such infrastructure projects aim to serve the greater good. The statement came amid debates over using religious land for public development.
The Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court has recused himself from hearing a PIL concerning judges’ appointments. The petition was filed by senior advocate Satish Trivedi. Following the recusal, the case will be reassigned. Another division bench, without the Chief Justice, will now hear the matter. Pryagraj: The Chief Justice of the Allahabad High […]
Today, On 27th February, A PIL has been filed in the Nainital High Court questioning the constitutional validity of the UCC Act and its rules. The petition argues that the Act may violate fundamental rights and constitutional principles. The court is expected to examine whether the legislation aligns with legal and democratic frameworks. This challenge could have important legal and societal implications.
Bombay: The Bombay High Court is scheduled to hear a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on February 19 regarding the deaths of actor Sushant Singh Rajput and his former manager, Disha Salian. This PIL demands the arrest and questioning of Shiv Sena (UBT) MLA Aditya Thackeray, claiming he might be linked to the mysterious circumstances surrounding their deaths.
NEW DELHI: Today (11th Feb): The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the National Federation of Indian Women (NFIW), which is associated with the CPI. The PIL raised concerns about the rising incidents of mob lynching and violence, especially by cow vigilantes. The Bench, led by Justice BR Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, referred to its previous ruling in the case of Tehseen Poonawalla v. Union of India and stated that while the ruling is binding on all authorities, the Court cannot oversee or monitor such incidents in every part of the country.
A PIL has been filed seeking a judicial panel to monitor and find details of people missing after the Kumbh stampede. Petitioner Suresh Chandra Pandey from Prayagraj cited reports about victims’ bodies being kept in poor conditions. The plea highlights concerns over handling the tragedy and demands better accountability. The court’s response to this petition is awaited.
Today, On 7th February, The Supreme Court, led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, refused to entertain a PIL filed by a former Army officer regarding the 1999 Kargil War. The court emphasized that matters of national defense fall within the executive’s domain and are not typically subject to judicial review. CJI Khanna stated, “The judiciary normally does not interfere in national defense,” reinforcing the separation of powers. The PIL sought intervention in decisions related to the war, but the court upheld the executive’s authority in military affairs.