A PIL has been filed seeking a judicial panel to monitor and find details of people missing after the Kumbh stampede. Petitioner Suresh Chandra Pandey from Prayagraj cited reports about victims’ bodies being kept in poor conditions. The plea highlights concerns over handling the tragedy and demands better accountability. The court’s response to this petition is awaited.
Today, On 7th February, The Supreme Court, led by CJI Sanjiv Khanna, refused to entertain a PIL filed by a former Army officer regarding the 1999 Kargil War. The court emphasized that matters of national defense fall within the executive’s domain and are not typically subject to judicial review. CJI Khanna stated, “The judiciary normally does not interfere in national defense,” reinforcing the separation of powers. The PIL sought intervention in decisions related to the war, but the court upheld the executive’s authority in military affairs.
The Bombay High Court issued a notice to the Maharashtra government on a plea seeking legal representation for children in custody battles. The petition argues that minors should have independent lawyers to voice their interests in family court disputes. The court has sought the state’s response on implementing such a provision. This move aims to ensure that children’s welfare is prioritized in parental custody conflicts.
New Delhi, February 3: The Supreme Court of India stated that all disabled candidates will now be allowed to take scribes to write their exams, even if they do not meet the benchmark disability criteria. This means that individuals with any disability, not just those with 40% or more of a specified disability, will be eligible for assistance.
Today, On 3rd February, The Supreme Court sought a response from the Bihar government on a PIL challenging the appointment of the BPSC chairperson. The petition questions the legality and process of the selection. The court has asked the state to clarify its stance on the matter. Further hearings will determine the validity of the appointment.
Today, On 3rd February, The Delhi High Court declined an urgent hearing on a PIL filed by a retired judge challenging cash-based schemes by political parties. The petition raises concerns over the impact of such schemes on fair elections. The court did not find immediate grounds for urgency. The matter will be considered in due course.
Today, On 3rd February, The Supreme Court will hear a petition on February 3, asking for better safety measures for devotees at the Maha Kumbh 2025. The petition was filed after tragic stampede deaths at past gatherings and calls for quick action to avoid such incidents. Chief Justice of India, Sanjiv Khanna, will lead the hearing today. The petition stresses the importance of proper crowd control and safety measures.
Today, On 31st January, The Supreme Court declined to hear a PIL challenging VIP darshans at temples. While the court agreed that such special treatment should not be given, it stated that it could not pass orders on the matter. The judges acknowledged concerns over fairness in temple access. However, they emphasized that regulating religious practices is beyond their jurisdiction.
The Madras High Court Registry requested Rs.20.04 crore from the Tamil Nadu government to install CCTV cameras in court complexes. Chief Justice K.R. Shriram’s bench has granted the government four weeks to respond to the Registry’s request. The Madras High Court has given the Tamil Nadu government four weeks to decide on sanctioning Rs. 20.04 […]
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Monday directed the state government and the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) to take strict action against “dummy” schools operating in the national capital. These schools allegedly grant Delhi domicile benefits to students from other states without requiring them to attend regular classes.