The BJP criticised the INDIA alliance for writing to Chief Justice Surya Kant over the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi alleged the Opposition was spreading misinformation, creating fear about elections, and attempting to undermine democratic institutions.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed a PIL seeking to deregister the Aam Aadmi Party and bar leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Durgesh Pathak over alleged refusal to appear before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in court proceedings.
A PIL before the Delhi High Court seeks action against the Election Commission of India to deregister the Aam Aadmi Party and its leaders for refusing to join proceedings before Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma in the excise case.
The Federation of All India Medical Association moved the Supreme Court of India alleging “systemic failure” by the National Testing Agency in conducting NEET-UG 2026, claiming the examination cancellation process severely damaged public confidence in India’s national medical entrance test system.
The Supreme Court of India flagged serious procedural defects in a petition filed by Association for Democratic Reforms challenging the CEC appointment law. The Court said the defect must be cured, adding, “Somebody has to take responsibility for the statements made.”
A PIL before the Supreme Court seeks removal of IPS officer Ajay Pal Sharma as Police Observer in West Bengal, alleging intimidation, bias, and conduct that may affect election neutrality. It claims his continued role risks public confidence and threatens free and fair 2026 Assembly Elections, raising concerns over democratic integrity and lawful conduct of electoral processes.
The family of Assam’s cultural icon Zubeen Garg submitted a memorandum to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, seeking a special court, faster trial in Assam, and appropriate diplomatic and legal action in Singapore regarding his death.
Today, On 12th January, The Supreme Court expressed deep dismay over the alleged misconduct of a Madhya Pradesh civil judge during a train journey, including urinating in the compartment. “Shocking, Disgusting Conduct of a Judicial Officer,” the Court said, condemning the act.
An advocate strongly criticized Sanjeev Sanyal’s remarks calling the judiciary a “hurdle.” The advocate stated, “Such a characterization as a hurdle must be carefully qualified,” cautioning that it risks misrepresenting the democratic balance of powers in India.
NEW DELHI: Today, 8th May: The Supreme Court of India has strongly criticised Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) Member of Parliament (MP) Nishikant Dubey for making offensive and untrue comments about the top court and the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna. A bench led by CJI Khanna said Dubey’s statements were “highly irresponsible” and showed a desire to seek attention by making baseless allegations against the judiciary.
