“Three Years She Was Silent”: Prajwal Revanna Claims Rape Case Is ‘Political Vendetta’ Before Karnataka High Court

Prajwal Revanna told the Karnataka High Court that the rape case and other charges against him were filed due to political motives. His counsel argued that multiple complaints surfaced suddenly and the investigation was biased.

‘Do you know the law?’: Delhi High Court Slams Rajasthan Police for Arresting Minors Without Informing Delhi Police, Violating Jurisdiction

The Delhi High Court asked, “‘Do you know the law?’” while slamming Rajasthan Police for arresting minors without informing Delhi Police. It said such actions violated legal jurisdiction and raised serious concerns over procedural lapses and accountability in law enforcement.

She Has No Basic Knowledge of Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders Training for Trial Court Judge Over Procedural Lapses

The Madhya Pradesh High Court criticized a trial court judge, stating she has no basic knowledge of law, and ordered training over serious procedural lapses.

BREAKING | BJP MLA Yatnal Defamation | “Fight Your Political Battles Outside, Not In Supreme Court”: CJI Gavai Rejects Minister Shivananda Patil’s Plea

Today, On 4th August, The Supreme Court, led by CJI Gavai, dismissed Karnataka Minister Shivananda Patil’s plea in the defamation case filed by BJP MLA Basangouda Patil Yatnal, saying, “Fight your political battles outside, not in Supreme Court.” The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from Karnataka Minister Shivananda S Patil, contesting a Karnataka High Court […]

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea Against Kailash Kher Over ‘Babam Bam’ Song

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court has dismissed the criminal case against famous singer Kailash Kher. He was accused of hurting religious sentiments through his song ‘Babam Bam’. The bench, consisting of Justices Bharati Dangre and Shyam C Chandak, emphasized the value of tolerance in a democratic society.

[NDPS Act] Bombay HC Orders NCB to Provide Investigation Reports in Vedish Thorat Drug Case

The Bombay High Court mandated the Narcotics Control Bureau to provide investigation documents to Vedish Thorat, arrested for drug offenses, including cultivating hydroponic weed. Thorat’s lawyer argued that the denial of crucial documents hindered his defense and violated fair trial rights. The case highlights procedural issues in narcotics investigations.

UPPCS-J 2022 Exam ‘Irregularities’: Allahabad HC Appoints Retired CJ Govind Mathur To Lead Probe

The Allahabad High Court, recognizing flaws in the 2022 UPPSC Judicial Services Examination, appointed a commission led by Justice Govind Mathur to reform the evaluation process. The commission will report by May 31, 2025, addressing issues like lack of standardized marking and procedural lapses that undermine the UPPSC’s credibility and public trust.

[Row Over OBC List] “Reservation Cannot Be On The Basis Of Religion”: Apex Court During the Hearing Of West Bengal Plea Against HC Judgement Quashing OBC Classification Of 77 Communities

The Supreme Court On December 9 addressed West Bengal’s petition against the Calcutta High Court’s annulment of OBC classification for 77 communities, mainly Muslim. Justice Gavai emphasized reservations cannot be religion-based. While Sibal defended the classification as socially rooted, Patwalia critiqued its implementation. The Court scheduled further hearings for January 2025.

[Khichdi Scam] Shiv Sena (Uddhav) Member Moves To Bombay High Court Against ED Arrest

The Bombay High Court directed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to respond to Shiv Sena member Suraj Chavan’s plea challenging his arrest related to a khichdi supply scam. Ordered to appear on November 14, Chavan argues his arrest violated his rights and lacked proper legal justification, claiming speculative accusations without credible evidence.

[Swati Maliwal Assault Case] Delhi HC Reserves Order on Bibhav Kumar’s Plea Challenging his “Illegal Arrest”

The Delhi High Court today reserved its decision on the legality of Bibhav Kumar’s arrest, a close aide of Arvind Kejriwal, following arguments from both sides. Senior Advocate N Hariharan argued unlawfulness, citing lack of prior notice. Meanwhile, the Delhi Police defended the arrest, alleging evidence tampering. The case’s political implications add complexity to the situation.