The Delhi High Court has sought a response from the Reserve Bank of India on a PIL alleging that NBFCs and digital lending apps breach borrowers’ privacy, asking RBI to clarify enforcement of its 2025 Digital Lending Directions effectively.
The Supreme Court of India stated that while using spyware like Pegasus is acceptable for national security, it must not target innocent individuals. The investigation report on Pegasus allegations remains confidential due to national sovereignty concerns. Those suspecting espionage can approach the court to find out if they were targeted.
The Calcutta High Court ruled that installing and operating CCTV cameras inside a home without the consent of co-occupants is a violation of privacy. In a dispute between two brothers, the court found that five cameras were wrongly positioned to monitor one brother’s private living space. Citing the Justice KS Puttaswamy vs. Union of India case, the court emphasized that privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and ordered the immediate restriction of these cameras.
Prajwal Revanna, former MP and grandson of ex-PM HD Deve Gowda, reviewed alleged sex videos linked to a scandal in a closed court session, involving data from his driver’s phone. The court denied full access to video evidence, emphasizing victim privacy and allegations of serious charges against Revanna, including sexual harassment and rape.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that foreign nationals facing criminal charges cannot leave the country until legal matters are resolved. It emphasized that bail conditions must respect privacy rights and cannot include invasive measures like tracking. The court clarified that civil authorities have limited roles in foreigner bail applications, ensuring justice is served.
The Kerala High Court ruled against the practice of publicly displaying defaulting borrowers’ photographs and details for loan recovery, citing violations of dignity and privacy under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act. The court emphasized lawful alternatives for debt recovery exist, reinforcing borrowers’ rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.