Supreme Court Grants Bail to SAD Leader Bikram Singh Majithia in Disproportionate Assets Case

The Supreme Court has granted bail to Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia in the disproportionate assets case, noting long custody and completion of investigation. Majithia has been in jail since June 2025 following his arrest by the Punjab Vigilance Bureau.

‘Acted as a Syndicate’: Delhi Court Lists Land-for-Job Case for Trial, Prosecution Evidence to Begin March 9

A Delhi court has listed the land-for-job case linked to alleged Railway appointments in exchange for land for trial and ordered day-to-day recording of prosecution evidence from March 9. The case involves former Railway Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav, his family members and other accused, with charges already framed under corruption and conspiracy laws.

PC Act| Section 17 Does Not Exclude or Prevent the State Police From Investigating Central Govt Employees: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that state police may investigate and prosecute Central government employees for bribery and corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act. It clarified that no prior approval from the CBI is required to register cases nationwide.

Land-for-Jobs Scam: Delhi High Court Reserves Order on Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Plea to Quash CBI Case

The Delhi High Court has reserved its verdict on Lalu Prasad Yadav’s petition seeking to quash the Central Bureau of Investigation case in the alleged land-for-jobs scam. The court heard arguments on the need for prior sanction under anti-corruption law and objections raised by the CBI on maintainability and delay.

“You May Be the ASG, Not the Judge”: Kapil Sibal and ASG Raju’s Fiery Courtroom Face-Off in Delhi High Court

A sharp verbal clash erupted between senior advocate Kapil Sibal and ASG SV Raju in the Delhi High Court during the hearing on Lalu Prasad Yadav’s plea to quash the land-for-jobs case. The court later stepped in to cool tempers and directed both sides to file brief written submissions.

Karti Chidambaram Challenges Corruption Charges in Chinese Visa Case, Delhi High Court to Hear Plea on Jan 19

Congress MP Karti Chidambaram has moved the Delhi High Court against the trial court order framing corruption and conspiracy charges in the Chinese visa case. He claims there is no evidence of bribe, demand, or conspiracy, and the High Court will hear the matter on January 19.

Delhi High Court Orders State to Ensure Functional PTAs in All Private Schools, Issues Notice

The Delhi High Court has directed the State government to take immediate steps to ensure that Parent-Teacher Associations are properly formed and functioning in all private schools in the capital.
The Court noted that non-constitution of PTAs deprives parents of a collective voice, especially in matters related to school fees and governance.

For a Self-Respecting Man, Death Is Preferable to Dishonour: Justice Viswanathan Cites Bhagavad  Gita in Split Verdict on Sec 17A PC Act

In a powerful opinion during the Supreme Court’s split verdict on Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Justice K.V. Viswanathan invoked the Bhagavad Gita to stress that personal integrity and honour are priceless for a public servant. He stated “For a Self-Respecting Man, Death Is Preferable to Dishonour”

Land-for-Jobs Case: Lalu Prasad Yadav Had No Role in Railway Appointments, Says CBI Before Delhi High Court

The CBI told the Delhi High Court that Lalu Prasad Yadav had no official role or public duty in railway appointments during his tenure as Union Railway Minister. The agency argued that decisions were taken by General Managers, making prior sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act unnecessary.

Constitutional Validity of Section 17A PC Act: Supreme Court Delivers Split Verdict; Justice Nagarathna Calls It Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court delivered a split verdict on the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. While Justice K.V. Viswanathan upheld the provision with safeguards, Justice B.V. Nagarathna dissented, calling it unconstitutional.