False ECI News: Court Registers Case Against ANI Editor Smita Prakash

A Lucknow court has registered a case against ANI Editor Smita Prakash over false news attributed to the Election Commission of India. The complaint said ANI circulated statements not released on ECI’s official website or verified platforms.

Defamation Case: Delhi High Court Issues Notice to AAP Leaders Atishi and Sanjay Singh

The Delhi High Court issued a notice to AAP leaders Atishi and Sanjay Singh in a defamation case filed by Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit. Justice Ravinder Dudeja directed them to submit their response by December 4 challenging the trial court’s decision.

‘No Direct Evidence’: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail to Jama Masjid Chairman in Sambhal Violence Case

Allahabad High Court granted bail to Zafar Ali, citing lack of direct proof linking him to the Sambhal mosque violence. The court said custody can’t be used as punishment without prima facie evidence.

Bombay High Court Takes Serious Action Against Advocate for Contempt Over ‘Scandalous’ Remarks in Disha Salian Case

The Bombay High Court initiated contempt proceedings against lawyer Nilesh Ojha for making scandalous statements during a press conference about the Disha Salian death case. The court found his remarks, which targeted a judge’s integrity, objectionable and ordered the immediate removal of the related video from online platforms. Further hearings are scheduled.

Delhi Court Rejects Sandeep Dikshit’s Defamation Case Against AAP’s Leader Atishi and Sanjay Singh

A Delhi court dismissed Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit’s defamation complaint against AAP leaders Atishi and Sanjay Singh, stating no valid grounds for proceeding. The judge, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Paras Dalal, noted there was insufficient evidence of defamation. Dikshit had sought Rs 10 crore in damages, claiming reputational harm.

Defamation Case || Court Rejects Plea for Prosecution of AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj: “Whimsical & Opportunistic”

A Delhi court rejected BJP leader Suraj Bhan Chauhan’s plea to prosecute AAP’s Saurabh Bharadwaj over alleged defamation in 2018. The court cited an expired limitation period and noted the delay in filing the complaint. It criticized Chauhan’s approach as whimsical and opportunistic. As a result, the case was dismissed.

Delhi Court Issues Notice to Delhi CM Atishi and Sanjay Singh Over Defamation Complaint by Congress Leader Sandeep Dikshit

NEW DELHI: Today (16th Jan): Delhi’s Rouse Avenue court issued a notice to Delhi Chief Minister Atishi Marlena and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh in response to a defamation case filed by Congress leader Sandeep Dikshit.

“We Still Have Freedom of Speech in This Country”: HC Rejects Plea Against Navjot Sidhu’s Wife’s Cancer Cure Claim

Today, On 4th December, the Delhi High Court rejected a plea challenging Navjot Sidhu’s claim regarding his wife’s cancer cure, emphasizing the importance of free speech. The court ruled that personal expression should not be curtailed by legal actions, allowing Sidhu’s statements to stand despite allegations of misinformation regarding cancer treatments.

“No Public Functionary in High Office Should Publicize a Private Event, It is Unfortunate”: Kapil Sibal Criticizes PM Modi’s Visit to CJI Chandrachud’s Residence for Ganesh Puja

Kapil Sibal criticized Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Chief Justice DY Chandrachud’s residence for Ganesh Puja, calling it “unfortunate.” He expressed concern over the publicized private event, stating that it sends the wrong message to the public and undermines trust in institutions. Sibal emphasized the need for public figures to avoid situations leading to speculation, which can harm institutions.

[Rameshwaram Cafe Blast] “I Had No Intention to Hurt The Sentiments of The People of Tamil Nadu By Any Conduct of Mine”: BJP’s Shobha Karandlaje Apologizes, HC Quashes FIR

Today, On 5th September, the Madras High Court quashed the FIR against BJP leader Shobha Karandlaje after the Tamil Nadu government accepted her apology for suggesting Tamil Nadu’s involvement in a bomb blast. The state’s decision to drop the legal proceedings emphasizes the significance of diplomatic resolutions and respect for public sentiments in sensitive matters.