Today, On 28th August, In the ongoing Presidential Reference before the Supreme Court,Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that a State government is a constitutional body and cannot claim fundamental rights, stressing that it cannot move a writ petition under Article 32.
Today, On 26th August, The Supreme Court on Day 5 of the Presidential Reference hearing questioned if it must remain powerless when Governors withhold assent to State Bills for years, stressing that indefinite delays cannot stall the democratic process or override legislative will.
Today, On 26th August, In the ongoing Presidential Reference before the Supreme Court, Puducherry argued that a Governor’s inaction on bills cannot always be seen as unconstitutional delay, stressing before the Constitution Bench that “not taking a decision is also a decision.”
The Supreme Court, while hearing the Presidential Reference on Governors’ powers, clarified it will not examine the contentious question of whether States can approach under Article 32 instead of Article 131 in Union–State disputes.
Today, On 19th August, In the Presidential Reference case on assent to bills, Attorney General R. Venkataramani questioned judicial overreach, asking, “Can Supreme Court say let me take pen and paper and rewrite the Constitution?” as he strongly criticised the court’s stance.
As the Constitution Bench begins hearing today, CJI Gavai’s meeting with President Murmu sparks controversy. Has judicial neutrality and justice already been compromised?
The Supreme Court will hear Punjab’s plea against the Governor referring two bills to the President. SG Tushar Mehta said, “Since this involves the same constitutional questions, let all such matters be heard together before the Constitution Bench,” but Singhvi objected.
Centre challenges Supreme Court ruling, asserting that it is the President, not the judiciary, who decides when to seek the court’s opinion, rejecting deadlines for Governors and the President.
The Centre told the Supreme Court that fixing timelines for President and Governors to act on Bills would upset the constitutional balance, stressing such powers are “non-justiciable.” SG Tushar Mehta warned that judicial overreach could trigger “constitutional disorder.”
The Punjab government has challenged the Governor’s decision to send a reference to the President under Article 200, while the Union government has sought the Supreme Court’s nod to refer the matter to a five-judge constitutional bench.
