Kerala High Court rules that spouses cannot file writ petitions on behalf of each other without a power of attorney, clarifying locus standi in property disputes.
HDFC Bank MD Sashidhar Jagdishan challenges FIR by Lilavati Trust, calling it a misuse of criminal law.
Bombay HC questions the validity of the complaint and adjourns hearing to next Wednesday.
Bombay High Court hears HDFC CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan’s plea to stay FIR filed by Lilavati Trust, citing “malicious misuse of law”. Court grants no-summons relief till Friday; matter posted for final hearing on July 23.
A Vakalatnama has been filed against the accused in the Vadodara accident case. Following legal proceedings, the accused has been sent to judicial custody. The victim’s lawyer confirmed this development. Further legal actions are expected in the case.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India has ruled that advocates are not required to verify whether a power of attorney (PoA) given to them by a litigant is genuine. This decision was made by a bench comprising Justices AS Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, who clarified that lawyers should only check the document’s authenticity if they have valid reasons to doubt it.
Today, On 6th January, The Supreme Court has set aside a cheating case against Goa MLA Jit Arolkar. A Bench of Justices A.S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan allowed Arolkar’s appeal, reversing the Bombay High Court’s decision, which had refused to dismiss the case. The cheating allegations were earlier filed against Arolkar. With this ruling, the matter stands resolved.
The Supreme Court ruled that a principal’s independent action effectively revokes the Power of Attorney (PoA) if known to both the agent and third parties, as evidenced in a property dispute case between two sisters. The ruling emphasizes clear communication and actions in revocation processes. It resulted in the revocation of the PoA favoring the agent, setting a legal precedent.
