Today, On 12th December, The Supreme Court has refused to modify its earlier order suspending the Enquiry Commission probing the Karur stampede case. The Court said the suspension will continue as directed, rejecting calls for reconsideration and stressing judicial consistency and fairness.
In the Pune MP/MLA Court, Rahul Gandhi’s counsel expressed fears of physical harm and political pressure, citing threats from BJP leaders and the complainant’s alleged links to Savarkar and Godse families. The defence urged the court to stay alert to “forces, influences, and extraordinary circumstances” surrounding the case.
A federal judge halted an effort by the Trump administration to prevent Harvard from admitting international students, deeming it a violation of law and academic freedom. Harvard argued this decision would drastically harm its community and violate constitutional rights. The case reflects broader attempts by Trump to control educational institutions.
Today, On 24th February, The Supreme Court of India refused to hear a PIL seeking protection for Hindus in Bangladesh amid reports of violence against minorities. The court stated that it cannot interfere in the internal matters of another country. The plea had urged the Indian government to take steps to safeguard Hindu minorities facing atrocities.
New Delhi [India], February 22: A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court of India asking the Union Government to take urgent steps to stop violence and attacks on Hindus and other minorities in Bangladesh. The plea also requests an extension of the cut-off date under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) 2019. The petitioner argues that many Hindus have entered India recently due to ongoing violence and should be considered for Indian citizenship.
The Supreme Court ordered a Special Investigation Team (SIT) to probe alleged custodial torture of two women during protests in West Bengal, replacing a previous CBI investigation. The Court directed the SIT’s formation and asked the Calcutta High Court to monitor the case, addressing concerns over bias and police integrity.
Chief Justice Dr DY Chandrachud emphasized the judiciary’s selective role in societal disputes, clarifying the absence of direct governmental pressure during his term. He underlined the importance of Parliament legislating marriage laws, especially in the context of same-sex unions. Moreover, he highlighted the ongoing dialogue between the judiciary, litigants, and civil society, advocating for livestreaming constitutional cases.
