“Is the Judiciary the New Political Arena?” – Arati Sathe’s Appointment as High Court Judge Triggers Uproar

Ex-BJP spokesperson Arati Sathe’s appointment as Bombay High Court judge draws flak.
Opposition questions judicial neutrality, demands her removal.

Madras High Court Urges Tamil Nadu Government to Cooperate with ED in TASMAC Probe

The Madras High Court urged Tamil Nadu to collaborate with the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding alleged financial irregularities involving TASMAC. The Advocate General opposed cooperation, criticizing the ED’s unannounced raids. The Court emphasized the need to avoid personal pride while questioning the ED’s motives, especially ahead of upcoming Tamil Nadu elections.

Retired Justice Chelameswar Criticizes Former CJI Chandrachud: ‘Not Worth Spending Time on That Name’

KERALA: Former Supreme Court judge, Justice Jasti Chelameswar, has always been known for his candidness, even during his tenure as a judge. This aspect of his personality was clearly visible at the Wayanad Literature Festival in December 2024, where he engaged in an insightful discussion with Member of Parliament, John Brittas, on the complex relationship between courts and politics.

BJP MLA Alleges Selective CCTV Installation in Laxmi Nagar; Delhi High Court Directs Chief Secretary to Take Action

The Delhi High Court directed the Chief Secretary to address complaints of selective CCTV camera installation in Laxmi Nagar following allegations by BJP MLA Abhay Verma. The MLA claimed bias in the installation process, accusing the AAP-led government of favoring areas represented by their party. The petition seeks equitable distribution of cameras and challenges the current approval process.

[Controversial Tweet] Bhushan Accuses Judge of Political Dog-Whistling, Must Read SC EVM’S Order

Prominent public figure Prashant Bhushan accused a judge of politically motivated “dog-whistling” in a controversial tweet. His critics attribute this to his history of judicial criticism and losing public interest litigations. The debate raises questions about judicial integrity and the need for respectful critique. Bhushan’s conduct may lead to potential contempt proceedings, provoking concerns about free speech.