Questioning Police Action Is Not A Crime, Criminal Law Cannot Be Used To Silence A Citizen: Madras High Court Quashes Case Against Two Men

The Madras High Court quashed criminal proceedings against two men, holding that merely questioning the legality of police action cannot constitute a criminal offence unless the essential ingredients of the alleged offences are clearly established. The Court found the accusations vague and legally insufficient.

Antilia Bomb Scare Case: Supreme Court Refuses Relief To Former Mumbai Police Officer Pradeep Sharma

The Supreme Court refused to interfere with proceedings against former Mumbai police officer Pradeep Sharma in the Antilia bomb scare and Mansukh Hiren murder case, dismissing his appeal against the Bombay High Court order rejecting discharge from criminal conspiracy charges linked to the high-profile 2021 investigation.

Complaint Filed Against Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah Over Angry Gesture at Cop: “Unconstitutional Conduct”

A complaint has been filed against Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah over his angry gesture at a police officer. The act has been described as “unconstitutional conduct,” raising concerns about misuse of authority and public decorum.

Punjab Court Orders Social Media Platforms to Remove Viral Audio Clip of Police Officer Involved in ‘Sex-for-Cash’ Case

A Ludhiana court ordered all social media platforms to remove a viral AI-generated audio clip of a Punjab cop involved in a ‘sex-for-cash’ controversy. The court said the content was unauthenticated, defamatory, and harmful to public trust and law enforcement.

Supreme Court Rules Section 175(3) BNSS Requires Magistrate to Review Police Submissions Before Ordering Investigation, Unlike Section 156(3) CrPC

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court of India has pointed out the key differences between Section 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section 175(3) of the recently enacted Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), particularly in the process of filing an FIR (First Information Report).

Police Officer Sends Facebook Request To Woman-Complainant: Bombay High Court Slams Cop Over Misconduct

The Bombay High Court criticized a Police Sub-Inspector for sending a Facebook friend request to a woman complainant at midnight, deeming the behavior unacceptable. This occurred during a hearing of her petition regarding police inaction in a theft case. The Court ordered the Deputy Commissioner of Police to address the incident in the next hearing on January 14.

“Strangling a Pregnant Wife Not Demonstrating Exceptional Brutality”: Bombay HC

Pradipsingh Murlidharsingh Thakur, initially sentenced to death for murdering his pregnant wife, had his sentence commuted to life imprisonment by the Bombay High Court, which determined the case wasn’t among the “rarest of the rare.” The court later directed the review of his eligibility for remission, despite state opposition based on his police status.

[Delhi Riots 2020 Case] Delhi High Court Denies Bail to Accused Shahrukh Pathan

The Delhi High Court today (22nd Oct) denied bail to Shahrukh Pathan, recorded aiming a firearm at a police officer during the 2020 Northeast Delhi riots. Despite spending four years in jail and the maximum sentence being ten years without reported injuries, Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma emphasized the seriousness of the charges.

[RG Kar Rape & Murder] Dr. Ashish Pandey in CBI Custody, Ex-Principal Sandip Ghosh & Officer Abhijit Mondal in Judicial Remand

Yesterday, On 5th October, Dr. Ashish Pandey was remanded to CBI custody amid an investigation involving a former principal and a police officer linked to the rape and murder of a trainee doctor at RG Kar Medical College. The case has ignited nationwide protests and demands for accountability in hospitals.

“Let this Be an Example to All Officers”: Kerala High Court Sentences Two Month’s Jail to Police Officer for Verbally Abusing Lawyer

The Kerala High Court convicted sub-inspector VR Rineesh for contempt of court, sentencing him to two months in jail, suspended for a year. The ruling aimed to deter police personnel from disrespecting legal professionals. Despite an apology, the court questioned its sincerity and emphasized the need for immediate and genuine remorse. The case has prompted calls for a fast-track mechanism to address police misconduct.